Friday, February 26, 2010

The Mother of All Mothers


Playboy bunny turned Leading Scientific Expert "Dr." Jenny McCarthy is once again in the news, claiming to have "fixed" her son's autism. This is as good an excuse as any to bring back one of my favorite little rants from last year (because I'm kind of busy today). I recycled this piece before and at that time I mentioned a fun fact about it: It's the only thing I've ever submitted to HuffPo that's been turned down flat. I'll let you draw your own conclusions as to why.

"Autism Speaks (and Speaks, and Speaks)" (Originally Published, 5.6.09)


Good news for people who think that posing nude in Playboy and hosting a crappy MTV game show automatically comes with its own PhD in neuroscience: Jenny McCarthy will soon have a daily platform from which to berate the medical community for not taking her advice on treating autism.

Unless you're lucky enough to have mercifully been born deaf, you're probably well aware of Jenny's delightful one-dingbat crusade to find someone or something to blame for her 5-year-old son's autism. For the past couple of years, she's jumped in front of pretty much every television camera and microphone in the continental United States to stir up unnecessary controversy over certain childhood vaccinations by proclaiming her belief that there's a link between them and autism and shouting down anyone who has the gall to doubt her credentials (or, in the case of Denis Leary, to doubt the veracity of the abundance of recent autism diagnoses in this country in the first place). Because, really -- why trust those doctors and their medical degrees when you can listen to Jim Carrey's girlfriend?

There's little as obnoxious in the pop cultural sphere as the celebrity who declares him or herself the all-knowing, unrelenting voice of experience on a particular subject simply because it happened to have touched his or her life in some way. For every one Michael J. Fox, who's fought Parkinson's with staggering humility and a dignified focus that's truly benefited others, there are ten Jenny McCarthys -- who write books on how gross it is that white stuff sometimes comes out of your vagina during pregnancy.

Actually I take it back; there is one thing more obnoxious: someone who enables that person.

In this case, the one foisting Jenny's show on an innocent public -- the one whose personal largess pretty much guarantees that Jenny McCarthy will be the next big thing in daytime television -- is none other than the event horizon of all human experience: Oprah. No one absorbs, assimilates, then repackages under her own mantle the breadth of existence that Oprah does; if something hasn't happened to her -- it just hasn't happened. Who the hell knows, maybe Oprah assumes that being tangentially associated with someone whose child is autistic will qualify her as an expert on yet another subject currently capturing the public's imagination. She had to have some way to stick her greedy little fingers in the autism pie, seeing as how she won't be getting her own kid, autistic or otherwise, at any point short of chloroforming one at her school in South Africa and sneaking him or her through customs in a giant box marked "make-up."

The real problem is that celebrities of the Oprah and Jenny McCarthy stripe are so used to being deferred to on just about every issue by the sycophantic media that they really have come to arrogantly believe that they're qualified to offer an informed opinion on anything they've Googled once or twice or read an article on while sitting in First Class. When we're talking about, say, Oprah's favorite funnel cake recipe or Jenny's thoughts on the feel of silicone versus saline breast implants -- no harm, no foul. But when they begin playing doctor -- when Oprah hypes the latest trendy Hollywood colon cleanse or Jenny recommends that parents not inoculate their children or touts Scientology-esque "cures" for complex diseases -- that's when things get dangerous.

Nothing Jenny McCarthy has suggested about the link between vaccinations and autism has been proven -- far from it. But Jenny isn't letting that stop her campaign of ignorance. She has her convictions as a mother and her moral certitude as a celebrity.

And soon, she'll have a bigger audience than she's ever had before.

6 comments:

SavageAphid said...

Good piece, but I can see why it's been turned down over at the HuffPo.

I'm sure that
"Actually I take it back; there is one thing more obnoxious: someone who enables that person."

hits them entirely to dead center for comfort.

Pea said...

"A medical journal in Britain has retracted a controversial study it published in 1998 that linked the use of a vaccine in children to autism." (source: http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2010/02/02/autism-mmr-lancet-wakefield.html#ixzz0gfuaXMuu)

You know what this means? This means that someone was being a Bad Scientist. It means that the gospel twits like Jenny McCarthy spout is based on Bad Science. And when someone is a Bad Scientist, we sit him in a corner to eke out the rest of his miserable career, publishing in low-ranked journals.

And when someone spouts Bad Science, we deflate her implants and ignore her. Because nothing is scarier to a famewhore than having no one paying her any attention.

/steps off soapbox

Capt. Ac said...

Jenny and I both rely on individual anecdotal evidence as our science, but our interpretations often lead to different results.

For instance, my conclusion is that Autism in children is caused as punishment to their mothers for sinning by allowing themselves to be photographed on the toilet.

http://i20.tinypic.com/vhxbbs.jpg

namron said...

Chez, I kind of want to pay to publish this in the NY Times. How much per line?

www.bklynsnc.com said...

Chez, I agree there is a certain symetry in psuedo-celebrity's like Jenny McCarthy spouting psuedo-science. Like Ms. McCarthy, I am the mother of an autistic son, and like her I share a concern for the well-being of all children. However, since no replicable, verifiable study has shown any connection between autism and vaccines, I hesitate to jump to the same conclusions Ms. McCarthy has.

Bad science helps no one, but actively endangers everyone. When parents don't vaccinate their kids for fear of autism, they put my child and all children at risk of contracting dangerous, preventable diseases.

Now, despite the talk of an "autism epidemic" that swirls around us all, I prefer to think of my rapidly progressing, autisti7-year-old as more neurollogically outnumbered than sick per se. Each to their own though, so if Ms. McCarthy and her alarmist ilk DO feel a calling to bring epidemics to public attention, perhaps her time would be better spent discussing polio, an epidemic once almost erradicated thanks to vaccines, but now resurging. Could this resurgence have anything to do with the fear of vaccination Ms. McCarthy's pronouncements engender?

Fear is often justified, but I think we should all take care to confine our fears to the right things for the right reasons.

altoids said...

The current vaccine/autism research has been like this obese lady.

She eats pies, cakes, cookies, ice cream, and candies. She give us eating peanut-butter fudge. Then she moans and groans. She has proven over and over and over again every time that she gives up one food that sweets do not cause obesity. She gave up the fudge for a year and didn't lose an ounce!

Dr. Andrew Moulden has done the research that connects vaccines and autism. You can watch his videos on youtube or his website brainguardmd. All vaccines cause ministrokes.

Also many autistic children have severe food allergies which is also caused by vaccinations! There is a new book out "The History of the Peanut Allergy Epidemic" by Heather Fraser. She found some interesting facts:

The WHO and FDA decided that refined peanut oil is GRAS and does not have to be listed on the package insert of pharmaceuticals. If you want to know if peanut oil is an ingredient in a vaccine, you are not entitled to know because it is a protected trade secret.

Peanut allergy is epidemic among our vaccinated children. 1 in 125 have a SEVERE peanut allergy which means they could die if they smell peanuts.

I want full disclosure of all ingredients on all pharmaceutical products... how about you?