Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Tuesday is Recycling Day

Last week, I posted a rambling, incoherent, borderline-lunatic quote from Victoria Jackson -- former Saturday Night Live cast-member turned bullhorn for the religious right. I also mentioned that her upbringing included a stint at Dade Christian School in Miami, a place I was lucky enough to attend for about six months when I was 13-years-old. (I say "lucky" because those six months provided me with more great stories than just about the entire rest of my childhood.) Over the course of this site, I've brought up my time at DCS on more than one occasion, and this morning I'm republishing a few of the best pieces dealing with Miami's only high school that also doubles as an insane asylum. Call it "The Dade Christian Chronicles."

"The Second Coming... and the Third, and the Fourth, Etc." (Originally Published, 7.8.08)

In the 8th grade, I briefly --very briefly -- attended a Southern Baptist school.

To call the entire experience harrowingly surreal would be an insult to the collected works of Dali and Argento. The reality was that life at Dade Christian was, and I'd imagine still is, a little like being held in a prison camp somewhere in Stepford enemy territory. It was generally almost impossible to tell which of the kids had truly succumbed and accepted Jesus Christ as their personal savior and were therefore willing vessels of the daily onslaught of superstitious nonsense being heaped on them by the school's silver-haired pastor -- a man straight out of Central Casting -- and which were just faking it out of fear that, if exposed, they'd be the targets of a point-and-screech mob scene, a la Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

It goes without saying that every class taught at Dade Christian was, in one way or another, a Bible class. There wasn't a scholarly subject or topic of debate that couldn't be improved upon by filtering it through a 2000 year old text written by people who literally knew nothing about anything. This, unfortunately, included sex education -- euphemistically rechristened "Human Development" and relegated to one or two class discussions helmed by a compact and balding, Phil Collinsy hyper-Southern Baptist named, amusingly, Bobby Winkler.

Winkler was a walking cliché -- the kind of guy who seemed to always be "on," as if he were acting for the invisible cameras of a Christian-themed reality TV show. He wanted to make sure that the kids in his care never doubted that the knowledge of an eventual ticket to heaven meant a life of 24/7 exuberance, and he went about it by rarely turning the "frenzy" setting below a flat nine. Any conversation with Winkler left you overwhelmed and in need of a nap.

One Friday afternoon, during his usual end-of-the-week "Ask a Bible Teacher Anything" segment, Winkler got hit with a question about the seemingly taboo topic of pre-marital sex. It's the sort of thing you would've expected to come from a class full of kids coping with a lot of nascent horniness, the kind that even Jesus couldn't help them stave off. One 13-year-old boy, a classmate of mine, asked Winkler what was so wrong with masturbation and sex in general -- why God had gone through all that effort to create it, only to turn around and declare it verbotten. (Obviously, the kid could've substituted just about any "sin" in place of sex and the argument would've worked just as well.)

Winkler's response to this perfectly legitimate question was to stand silently for a moment, seemingly taken aback, then ask the class in his booming southern drawl if it could answer the question of "why God doesn't want you to play with yourself."

The kid who asked the question, sufficiently shamed to the point of immediately trying to fashion a noose out of his shoelaces, shrunk into his seat and didn't speak up in class again -- ever again. Still, Winkler I guess figured he might as well attempt to clarify for his charges just what Jesus's specific rules were when it came to the pleasures of the flesh. He stalked back and forth in front of the blackboard, prattling off the usual "sex is between a married man and woman in the eyes of God" spiel, the sweat glistening on his abundant forehead like the AC had died and it wasn't a brisk 60 degrees in his classroom. This line of religio-blather continued for several minutes -- Winkler laying out (no pun intended) the standard Baptist arguments against pre-marital contact of any kind -- before the Bible teacher suddenly stopped cold, turned to face the class and said something that made pure liquid nitrogen run down my spine, even at the age of 13.

He looked at us -- his eyes scanning the class one face at a time -- gave us a frightening grin that can't be described as anything other than, ironically, devilish, and said quietly, "But let me tell you what happens when you get married. Once you're married -- you can do anything you want to your wife."

I bring this story up to show that the entire idea of sex and Christian Conservatism has always made me more than a little queasy. The two notions -- whether the former is of the married variety or not -- just seem completely incongruous. And yet something strange seems to be happening these days: Christian Conservatives, as they do with so many other subjects, are usurping and dominating the debate over sex by adopting an attitude that they can lay (once again, no pun intended) claim not only to sex but to better sex. As if Jesus makes them come harder than the rest of us, maybe as a little something to tide them over until the real rapture shows up and brings them all that eternal bliss.

The God folks arrogantly dictating the parameters of the discussion on sex in our society -- and everyone else willingly ceding the floor to them -- is a bad idea all the way around. People who've only experienced sex, ostensibly, with one person claiming to be experts on the subject is a laughable conceit.

Although not a surprising one, if Bobby Winkler and his implied proclivities are any indication.

God help his wife.

Read on:

(Salon.com: Jesus Loves You -- and Your Orgasm)

"And By the Way, If You See Your Mom this Weekend, Would You Be Sure and Tell Her, 'SATAN! SATAN! SATAN!'" (Originally Published, 10.31.06)

I always found Halloween to be kind of a silly holiday. I certainly understand its pagan roots, but at this stage of civilization -- things being what they presently are and all -- I can't help but feel that the inflated emphasis on ghosts, witches, black cats and the like as objects of fear is, well, Rockwellian in its quaintness.

I mean, could any of Edgar Allen Poe's delusions -- even at its most brutally drug-induced -- have ever metastasized into something as perfectly evil as Dick Cheney?

Terrorists want to kill me; my President doesn't have a brain, yet still inexplicably walks, talks and smirks; his ostensible second-in-command is regularly seen growling, and shoots his elderly friends in the face; human viscera lines the streets of Iraq -- and you're telling me the ranch-style house up the street with a couple of tombstones in the front yard, a vegetable with a face carved in it, and the all-night Monsterfest on A&E is supposed to scare me?

Sure thing.

That said, I'll relay a truly terrifying tale from my short time at one of the most frightening places on Earth: Dade Christian School.

The God-fearing men and women who ran the place were -- and no doubt still are -- committed to making sure that all of their students have a Halloween that's happy, safe, and free of the torment of eternal damnation. That's why every year, the school has its own Halloween party in which each child is encouraged to dress as -- wait for it -- his or her favorite Bible character. Needless to say, this typically causes some confusion, seeing as how the whole beard and robes thing was pretty much the only look going back in the day.

Upon learning the theme of the traditional Dade Christian Halloween-Without-Hell Extravaganza, I of course began peppering the teacher with question after ridiculous question about what my costume could and couldn't entail:

Could I pour salt all over myself and be Lot's wife?

What about water? Would dousing myself in water help me to stand out as obviously being Noah?

Could I just come naked and be Adam?

If I dressed as Pharaoh, could I cast the entire school into bondage?

Isn't Satan technically a Bible character?

These annoyances continued until the teacher finally ended them in the usual way: by sending me to the Dean's office.

Surprisingly, he wasn't expecting to see my face again so soon -- being that a few days earlier, an angry and frustrated faculty chaperone had deemed that I be exiled to his office for reading the novelization of Halloween III: Season of the Witch during the entire bus ride to and from our class trip to Disney World.

You know something? Now that I think about it -- maybe dressing as a Christian really is the scariest costume imaginable.

Happy Halloween, kids -- and whatever you do, stay away from Old Man Cheney's house.

"Jesus Loves Me, This I Know, For My Parents Tell Me So" (Originally Published, 10.8.06)

There are times when living in this city isn't simply tolerable but downright wonderful. Yesterday, my wife and I spent the afternoon wandering through the labyrinthian Museum of Natural History -- taking in the myriad exhibits on the science of the universe and mankind's growth throughout the millennia. We followed this up with a walk through a street fair in the kind of crisp air which can only herald the dawn of autumn, then an evening at my agent's place on the Upper West Side, drinking wine on the terrace and watching twilight descend over the city in shades of blue and purple, providing a view which was beautifully augmented by the rise of a giant and glowing full moon.

This morning, I dragged myself out of bed, threw on a leather coat and wandered out onto a relatively quiet York Avenue to grab a cup of coffee and a few provisions for the refrigerator. Given that I had no intention of straying very far from my apartment, I neglected to bring along my iPod -- an accoutrement which is attached to my person with the regularity of a soldier's sidearm. The lack of Dave Brubeck pumping into my head (the perfect soundtrack to a Sunday morning in Manhattan, I believe) of course meant that my ears were open to the sounds of the city itself.

It meant that I was able to listen to and fully appreciate the conversations taking place outside of St. Monica's Catholic Church on East 79th Street.

On the steps of the church sat a mother and what I assume were her two young children; she was explaining to them Christ's inarguable plan for their lives. Not far away, I strode alongside a family which had apparently just exited Sunday mass; the children were, as children do, innocently questioning the dogma which the priest had just laid out for them in no uncertain terms. It made me smile and shake my head -- a somewhat ironic gesture for a somewhat ironic moment.

Here were a group of children, willing to no doubt thoroughly buy into the existence of Santa Claus, asking logical questions about a professed truth which even to their young minds seemed incomprehensible. Their parents' predictable response to this curiosity?

Just trust us; you have to believe because that's the way it is.

Suffice to say, it took me back.

As it's Sunday, perhaps a confession is in order: I was raised in a Christian household.

To many, this will come as absolutely no surprise; it takes a fierce knowledge of -- and an even fiercer indoctrination to -- a given belief to eventually wage war against its tenets in any meaningful way. At some point -- exactly when, I can't recall -- I made a personal decision that religion in general and Christianity in particular was nothing more than absurdist wishful thinking, and that in this day and age it's more likely to get you killed by those with equal but opposite views of the hereafter than it is to create a more ethical and moral Earth for the totality of mankind to reside upon.

Needless to say, a majority of America and the world disagrees with me -- which as far as I'm concerned in no way substantiates its opposing position. For some reason we've come to accept Validation Through Democracy: the idea that the larger the group to adhere to a belief, the more likely it is for that belief to be accurate. Obviously, this is nonsense; it's entirely possible for a very large group of people to believe something that is completely false. At the risk of proving Godwin's Law -- it's important to remember that Hitler once had the overwhelming support of his people.

Many of those who are true believers in the concept of religion, of course, are parents. It is also, of course, these parents who instill their religious beliefs in their children, essentially creating an inherited fear of God in the same way an inherited eye-color, acquiesence to the parents' ideas of right and wrong, and even the parents' political beliefs are passed along. The end result is that religion becomes simply another ill-fitting hand-me-down. As I witnessed first-hand on the street today, kids will believe whatever their parents tell them: Insist that they must be "saved" and accept Jesus Christ as their personal savior and it will take years for them to believe otherwise (that is, if they ever do -- as opposed to simply passing down to their own kids the beliefs they themselves never thought to question).

If you'd like a frightening example of the dangers of this kind of indoctrination, go see the new documentary Jesus Camp. True, the film highlights only the most fervent of Christian extremists, but make no mistake that the ambition of these extremists is to thoroughly claim the United States of America for Christ. They want nothing less than the dawn of a new theocracy, and -- to borrow a line from George Benson by way of Whitney Houston -- they believe the children are their future.

The film focuses on the "Kids on Fire" camp which is located (ironically) at Devil's Lake, North Dakota. While there, children are forcefully instructed how to become "Christian Warriors" -- the eventual frontline in the battle to win the hearts, minds and souls of America. It's essentially a Jedi camp for Fundamentalist Christians, with a rather unassuming pastor named Becky Fischer playing the part of Yoda. Some of the film's most trenchant images are of children -- most under the age of ten -- weeping openly, speaking in tongues, praying before a large cardboard stand-up of George W. Bush (an image, coincidentally, with roughly the same IQ as the real President Bush), and talking about their initial desire to be "saved" because, at the astute age of five, they realized that they simply needed something "more" in their lives.

It would all be hilarious, if it weren't so utterly disturbing.

Some have seen the movie and have called the tactics and methods used on these children nothing short of brainwashing; unfortunately, it's simply parents doing what many parents do -- passing their beliefs down to their children, and giving them no other real option. Kids generally want to please their parents during their formative years, so if, as a parent, you tell your kids that they should believe the sun revolves around the Earth -- or that they need to be saved by Jesus Christ -- you can be all but assured that that's exactly what they'll do.

Understand, neither Pastor Becky Fischer nor the mothers and fathers who send their children to Camp Kids on Fire care one bit about my opinions or beliefs. To them, I'm to be at the very least pitied for what will surely be an eternity in hell -- or at most, despised for openly wishing to inflict my belief in logic and reason on the rest of the planet, which would inevitably turn it away from their "One True God."

This leads me to confession number two: For a very short time (not even a full year, for reasons which should be obvious) I went to a Fundamentalist Southern-Baptist school.

For the record, my parents sent me to Dade Christian School not because they were zealots or in fact subscribed at all to the school's extremist take on Christianity; I went there because it was right up the street from my home as a teenager and because it actually did offer an excellent education. Unfortunately, with that education came indoctrination. Dade Christian was -- and still is, unless raided by the ATF at some point -- the kind of school which force-fed students Evangelical dogma to the point of exerting a chilling level of control over not just their lives in school, but at home as well. Children weren't allowed to hold hands -- in school or out -- dance, attend rock concerts or generally do the things that normal kids often do. Important to mention at this point is the fact that the students who either truly believed the teachings of the school or simply hoped to ingratiate themselves with the teachers could be counted on to report the behavior of those kids who broke the rules outside of the school gates back to the almighty administration. Dade Christian School operated as if it were an occupied city -- complete with traitorous spies and a Vichy student government.

It goes without saying that I was less than popular with the occupying force, acting as the metaphorical insurgent who wandered the streets painting a giant red V over each Bible verse.

The clash of beliefs however reached critical mass in the wake of a tragedy.

A few years before enrolling at Dade Christian, I became friends with a young girl who lived up the street from me. Her name was Debby, and she and I would meet most afternoons to play kickball and generally get into trouble. We had both recently passed the point in life where boys and girls loathed each other, which meant that there was an odd but undeniable undertone of intimate curiosity to our relationship. We liked each other -- quite a bit in fact. We had the kind of relationship which was tinged with a level of youthful discovery that in retrospect brings a bittersweet smile to my face.

At some point however, it just stopped; she still lived up the street from me, but for a reason unknown to me at the time she simply seemed to disappear.

It was later, during my first day at Dade Christian, that I ran into Debby again. She was warm and kind to me, but strangely distant. I did my best to put it out of my head; I figured I would need all of my mental faculties to resist the school's relentless day-to-day prosyletism.

Debby and I never really talked again; we never got the chance to.

A few months after my encounter with her, there was a fire not far from my house. I awoke to the sound of firetrucks screaming past my window and quickly rushed outside to see what was going on -- running after the trucks until I saw what exactly had dragged them to my quiet neighborhood in the middle of the night.

Debby's home was on fire.

I stood silently, bathed in flashes of deep-red as the lights from the trucks created a chaos of long shadows and violent bursts of color. I watched Debby's mother -- whom I'd never actually spoken to -- cry loudly and collapse into a firefighter's arms. I never saw Debby come out; that's because she didn't.

I walked home numb -- a lack of feeling which lasted well into the next day at school. It was there, surrounded by tearful students and teachers, comforting each other with the knowledge that Debby was in a better place, that something overcame me. My numbness was replaced by something else: sheer fucking rage. I didn't doubt the honesty or sincerity of those who grieved at Dade Christian School, I did however doubt that they ever knew the Debby that I did. They never saw the truly beautiful young girl underneath the thick topcoat of artifice with which they had covered her through the perpetual insistence that there was something wrong with her -- that she needed to be "saved," and needed to denounce her humanity, herself. To those who truly believed the teachings I was inundated with daily, Debby was simply another lucky Christian soul gone to heaven.

My anger finally exploded just a few days later, during the memorial service held for my friend at the New Testament Baptist Church, which ran Dade Christian School. It was there that something so repugnant happened that I have no doubt of its impact on my view of religion since. During the service, the silver-haired pastor -- a man who looked as if he came right out of Central Casting -- stood on the stage and uttered these words:

"Perhaps something good can come from Debby's death. Perhaps it can teach you all that you can be taken from this world at any moment, and that you cannot take your immortal soul for granted. You have to accept Jesus Christ as your personal savior now, because there may not be a tomorrow."

He then urged those who were saved or wished to be to come up to the stage to bear witness for all of those in the crowd.

It was at that moment that I got up and walked out.

I was in the outer lobby of the church -- pacing and shaking with what I feared was an uncontrollable fury -- when one of my teachers, one I happened to like, came out to find me. She asked me if I was alright, and that was when I let everything inside me come bursting out.

I tried to keep my voice down, but I wound up seething and spitting anger through clenched teeth. I told her that what was going on just behind those double-doors was wrong. I told her that she couldn't possibly condone that kind of macabre exploitation of a student who sat in one of her classes just days ago. I told her that there was no reason for Debby's death, nor the death of any other kid -- and that justifying or rationalizing that kind of tragedy was simply outrageous. I told her she couldn't possibly believe in a god that would allow such groundless suffering. I told her the death of a young girl was just fucking wrong.

And then I cried.

Rather than defend the grotesque spectacle taking place just a few feet from us, the teacher simply nodded her head in acknowledgement.

But there were others who didn't. Who wouldn't. They were children -- like the baleful faces at Camp Kids on Fire -- who have been the targets of so much religious agitprop throughout their formative years, from parents who believe that they're doing God's will, that they truly believe that the death of one of their own would offer a silver-lining in the form of an object lesson from on high. At the risk of being too provocative, you have to ask yourself: If this kind of manipulation of children were coming from anyone but those who preach the dominion of Jesus, would we as a nation tolerate it?

Yesterday, my wife and I visited the Museum of Natural History. As we took in the exhibits on the earliest incarnation of the universe, the earliest incarnation of man, and the fossils which act as a concrete testament to the existence of dinosaurs -- it dawned on me that there are children in this country who believe none of it. They deny proven fact because their parents do. They've learned to demand nothing less than a new age of unreason.

Which is nothing compared to demanding that the death of one of them be accepted as the unquestionable work of a god who operates in ways we're not meant to understand.

The best we can hope for, is that they grow out of it.


Jeremy said...

'He looked at us -- his eyes scanning the class one face at a time -- gave us a frightening grin that can't be described as anything other than, ironically, devilish, and said quietly, "But let me tell you what happens when you get married. Once you're married -- you can do anything you want to your wife."'

Anything... and there ain't a damn thing she'll say about it, as long as you marry a good Baptist girl...

L. said...

Yipes. Thankfully my parents raised all four of their daughters as heathens (my father refers to himself as a 'recovering Catholic'). I'm all for open-mindedness, but I'm also for consent...

Adrienne Saia said...

There is nothing like the death of a child to make even the most ardent supporter of the "God's plan/everything happens for a reason" theory disavow it on the spot.

That was my experience, anyway. There's no fucking reason that should happen. And if it's a plan, the plan's seriously fucked.

Anyway, I'm glad you re-posted all of this, although I'm off to mainline an entire bottle of Xanax to calm my rage.

Keep on, Chez.

Benoit from Ottawa said...

"The best we can hope for, is that they grow out of it."

Yup. Just about right. Mostly, they do. Otherwise, for instance, the Sixties would not, could not have happened. Barack Obama could not have been elected, even given the circumstances.

Good sense* often prevails.

*I've given up calling it "common sense". Not actually all that common anymore.

Tania said...

They may grow out of it, if they get the chance to be exposed to people who think differently - or hell, just think at all. Or if they are allowed to read, hear and see things which question their beliefs.
For all our sakes, I hope that most of the kids are allowed to do just that. It's probably too late for the adults.

The Manimal said...

As a society we worry so much about kids being physically molested that we forget that there are other ways that long term psychological damage can be inflicted on a child.

Ally said...

If I haven't told you yet, I respect your opinions on the subject of religion, Chez. The school sounds horrifying, to say the least. I just think in defense of those who do believe in God, a couple of points should be made:

Any asshole can be a Christian, but not all Christians are assholes. Nor do they all molest and
torture kids, nor do they all brainwash people around them. There is a small group of devout who concentrate solely on their beliefs, and don't try to shove those beliefs down anyone else's throats - even their kids. I'm related to one such person.

I know you were writing about the other side of the coin - those assholes who are Christian - but damn if it doesn't just get tiring of hearing about "those" people, and not the ones who are truly good people.

I've raised my children to believe in God, but I have yet to find myself threatening their childhood experiences with "you'll go to Hell" (we do say this as a joke, and the kids know it is a joke) or "because I just say so, that's why" statements. To be honest, I think both are copouts. I don't have the first clue as to where they'll go when they die; I'd never presume as much. I have enough of a task wondering where I'll go.

I make them mind because I want them to be responsible when they grow up, so as not to be a burden on others. I make them come to church with me because I think many of the life lessons taught in my parish church are very good ones.

And as a mother who lost a child, let me just say this: pain in tangible, and pain makes people say and do shitty things - and skilled public speaker can spin anything, even a child's death, into their own personal agenda.

When my daughter died, and I had to sit there and look at her surviving twin, a healthy boy, the only thing I wanted to think about was that maybe she went to someplace good, a place like Heaven. Because I do believe in the soul, and I do believe the soul goes on.

Considering that my daughter ceased to exist in any way, and was only a pile of bones in a grave, hurt beyond words. I could handle her body being dead; I couldn't handle her soul being dead. I've never thought for one second that it is. But I also don't think that she was "taken" from me to serve a higher purpose. The God I believe in doesn't "take" children. Bodies die from illness and defect. Bodies die from someone else's actions. Bodies die from accident. I don't think God has to take anyone; there's already plenty of other sources to do the job for him.

But I don't really have an argument for you as to whether or not there is a God. I believe there is; you don't. I have no proof, you have no proof, Chez. We could go on and on, and never come to an agreement. Does it really matter? Can we not just respect one another's beliefs for the sake of decency, and mind our own fucking business when it comes to the rest?

But I do have an argument for the zealots you've written about: they're fucktards. People: Don't listen to, or do, anything they say. And it's pointless to keep calling out attention to them and their stupid antics. Most of us who already know they are poison and those who don't understand this or won't, can't be helped anyway. Make a general public service announcement, and call it a day.

People who are genuinely devout Christians will not try to "save" you. They'll care for you and love you without reservation, regardless of your beliefs.

Oh, and a funny aside: I asked a priest I'm very fond of to tell me what constituted sin, sexually, in a marriage. He looked at me for a long minute and said, "as long as your husband's orgasm is expelled within your body, the act is not a sin."

I thought that was pretty damn funny wording. When I pressed him on elaborating for me, ("So does this count: on my tummy? In my hand? Between my boobs?") he just got redfaced and repeated the same exact words.

Narbe said...

Religion is pretty much a business. And they're always looking to expand their client-base. A funeral means losing a client and so they want to get another one, or better yet several more. My wife and I went to a funeral for one of our friend's fathers few months a go and the preacher spent about half the time talking about how one should wonder where they'll be when they pass away. It was nothing short of disgusting.

The Manimal said...

"As long as your husband's orgasm is expelled within your body, the act is not a sin."

You heard it here first ladies: if you want to stay right with God you're gonna have to swallow.

Anonymous said...

"People who've only experienced sex, ostensibly, with one person claiming to be experts on the subject is a laughable conceit."

That is an astoundingly arrogant, ignorant thing to say. Having multiple sexual encounters (dud, average or excellent) under your belt isn't a prerequisite for a good sex life. Conservative christians who're sexually active are just as capable of recognising bad/good sex as anyone else, and thus are just as qualified to talk about their personal sexual experience as anyone else.

What does qualify one as an 'expert' then? Promiscuity? A personal history of bad sex? Being really kinky and willing to do whatever your partner wants? There's no good measure so lets no speculate about what makes one worthy of speaking publicly about sex, or advocating for a particular sexual lifestyle.

More to the point though, from what I've read, there's a fair bit of evidence out there to suggest that conservative Christian couples (who save themselves for marriage and then stay faithful) are doing something right. For one thing, they obviously avoid the STI/pregnancy risks the rest of us face. Women in such relationships report more frequent and stronger orgasms than women who've had more partners, outside a marriage relationship. And it seems that the spiritual and physical compact that two people make with each other, to their minds in the sight of God, leads to less game-playing and manipulation when it comes to sex, and leaves both partners better cared for and more satisfied sexually.

I want to note that I'm not beating any drum here. I'm not a Christian and I am not 'saving myself'. I just think its dismaying that Chez (and society at large, oftentimes) are happy to write-off a whole group of people as hopelessly inexperienced, without considering that perhaps such people may have valid things to say and are just as able as anyone to talk about getting good sex.

Ally said...

LOL@ The Mamimal : That's almost EXACTLY what my husband said...

JLG said...

my best friend is a Baptist
she's quite open-minded
she'd have to be to be friends with me
her mother isn't
if her mother knew half the things that i've done
my best friend wouldn't be allowed to talk to me ever agin
not that that would stop her