Wednesday, July 08, 2009

Forever and Never, Amen


"Fancy a big house, some kids and a horse. I can not quite, but nearly guarantee a divorce. I think that I love you. I think that I do. So go on, mister -- make 'Miss Me' 'Mrs. You.'"

-- Zero 7, Distractions

"There's no guarantees. There's no guarantees. There's no guarantees."

-- Ryan Adams, Political Scientist (from the album Love is Hell)


Part 1: In Which Things Fall Apart


As these kinds of things go, it started off pretty standard: There was the disgraced, white male political figure, his head hung in just the right amount of requisite shame; the frenzied gaggle of vulturine media types, electricity shooting through their veins from being in the immediate presence of a human being who was about to be reduced to little more than a lifeless carcass ripe for the picking; the flashes of the strobes and the podium adorned with a bouquet of microphones. We knew the drill. We'd seen it all before and understood what was next. Another politician caught, literally, with his pants down was going to confess his sins to the American people. He'd apologize for betraying his constituents, his family, God, whomever, and stoically ask for forgiveness in exchange for a trip to sex-addict rehab with his spiritual adviser or some other such horseshit.

This was the way it worked. How it went for Gary Hart, Bill Clinton, Eliot Spitzer, John Edwards, and so on. It was contrition-as-theater, and we all knew the script.

But a funny thing happened when it was South Carolina governor Mark Sanford's turn to take the stage in the role of the respected leader embroiled in a career-threatening sex scandal: He went "off-book," quickly dropping the cool, practiced and thoroughly unconvincing I-let-myself-down routine in favor of being, well, human. The result was nothing short of captivating -- the public implosion, body and soul, of a man for whom public implosions wouldn't seem possible. Sanford didn't downplay his relationship with his mistress, whom he'd just spent six days with in her home country of Argentina; he eulogized it. Rather than taking the politically expedient route and reducing the other woman to an anonymous figure intruding on the sacred ground of his marriage, he did exactly the opposite -- coming apart at the seams as he admitted that he was, in fact, deeply and passionately in love with the person for whom he was willing to risk his life as he knew it. If it didn't garner a surprising pang of sympathy from the millions of Americans who'd been there, who understood what it was like to suddenly find the heart in a violent battle with all better judgment, then at the very least it deserved credit as a hell of a clever bit of misdirection.

To hear Mark Sanford tell it, Maria Belen Chapur wasn't the other woman. She was the woman. The only woman.

Since last week's startling and revealing announcement, Mark Sanford the overwhelmed inamorato has slowly begun to morph back into Mark Sanford the reptilian politician: He's admitted to having "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during his 20 year marriage and he's contradicted his own story several times. But he still can't shut up about "Maria," whom he calls his "soulmate."

"This was a whole lot more than a simple affair, this was a love story," Sanford says, sounding like he's about to compose a sonnet. "A forbidden one, a tragic one, but a love story at the end of the day."

If you find this more than a little amusing -- the thought of a typically uptight and sanctimonious Republican politician suddenly drama-queening out, turning into poor, stupid lovestruck Paris, willing to bring war to Troy's doorstep in the name of the beauty who's so entranced him -- you're certainly not alone.

But you've got to wonder how Mark Sanford's wife Jenny, the mother of his children, feels about all this florid praise aimed in the direction of a woman other than herself. I'm sure it was especially stinging when the good governor said in an interview that he was trying to learn to fall back in love with his wife. That's the kind of revelation that gets a man killed in his sleep.

Still, and I realize this question will be seen as impertinent by some: Didn't she sign up for this? Didn't she know the risks inherent not simply in marrying someone with political aspirations but, to some extent, in marrying anyone? And for that matter -- didn't he? Didn't they realize that, at any point and for no discernible reason, one or the other of them could fall out of love -- or fall in love with someone else -- and walk out the front door without ever looking back?

Don't we all understand the reality by this point?

So why do we do it -- why do we get married anymore -- at all?

The Kids in the Hall once did a sketch where they compared getting married to skydiving. It ended with one of the cast-members putting America's oft-quoted marriage statistics into jarring perspective by essentially saying: Would you jump out of a plane if you knew that there was only a 50% chance of your chute opening?

As much as I wish it weren't true, and as much as I hate to drop another couple of pop culture references, the events that have taken place in my own life in the past several months have conspired to make me think quite a bit about the entire institution of marriage. To challenge my long-held perceptions about it -- and my overall belief in it and in the ability of two people to make it last these days. At the core of my cynicism: personal experience -- both direct and indirect -- with two assumptions that are rooted in undeniable fact.

First, as Chris Rock famously said, a man is only as faithful as his options -- although I'd expand that proposition to include the opposite sex as well. To some extent, we're all looking to trade up -- physically, emotionally, financially -- and the temptation of the perfect opportunity to do just that is often impossible to completely resist. (Just ask Jerry Seinfeld's wife, Jessica Sklar, who left her first, non-household-name husband immediately after their three-week Italian honeymoon to begin dating TV royalty.) And even if the opportunity never does in fact come to fruition, isn't the knowledge of this kind of innate desire a deal-breaker in and of itself? You can't spend your whole life hoping nobody better than you comes along.

Second, in the immortal words of TV's Dr. House -- everybody lies.

Everybody. No matter who you are. One way or the other, you're likely covering something up, hiding the truth from the person you claim to love, burying a deep, dark secret that, if revealed, would constitute an Extinction Level Event in your relationship. If you're not now, you probably have at some point. We tell the biggest lies to the ones we're closest to, whose lives we affect the most and who in turn have the ability to drastically affect ours. We do it to keep the peace, or, we tell ourselves, as an act of pure altruism -- to keep our partners safe from unnecessary harm, the harm that we ourselves would cause.

Some would look at Mark Sanford and say, rightly, "the balls on this guy." He actually had the colossal arrogance to ask his wife for permission to visit his paramour -- who's an ex-television news producer, incidentally, proving my well-tested theory that the TV news business grows amoral sexual predators like fruit on the vine -- after he was busted writing romantic e-mails to her. Needless to say, Jenny Sanford, having a thimble-full of self-respect, told him where to shove his burning schoolboy desire: She "politely denied" his request, then threw him out of the house when he ignored her, ditched his official tail, and went to Argentina anyway.

"It’s one thing to forgive adultery, it’s another to condone it," she says, in what's sure to become an Oprah-approved battle-cry for scorned women everywhere.

Once again though, she had to know that this day would, in one form or another, come. She had to grasp, even from the beginning, that no matter the ostensible strength of the foundation she'd built with her husband -- years together, kids, a home, mutual friends, a joint membership at the local country club -- that it could all come crashing down and be rendered utterly meaningless at some point. That he'd be willing to betray it all for a cheap, ego-stroking thrill. Or that she might. Humans are painfully flawed creatures -- maybe too inherently flawed to make a marriage, the brass ring marriage we're taught to strive for by movies and TV commercials, work and last.

I want to believe in a love that lasts forever and can withstand anything -- the good times and bad. And for a long time I believed just that. I clung desperately, passionately to the fantasy that there was a "right person" and that being in a committed relationship with her or him -- while not without conflict, trauma, and a lot of hard work -- would be rewarding in immeasurable ways, because that person would bring out the best parts of you and you would do likewise.

I believed so strongly in that. I don't anymore.

And I'm betting that almost everyone involved in the Sanford affair -- Mark, Jenny, Maria, even Maria's stunned and betrayed boyfriend -- feels the same way.

Like everything else these days, love is a many fickled thing.

If you don't think this is true, don't worry. You'll eventually find out the hard way.


"The cruelest lies are often told in silence."

-- Robert Louis Stevenson


Part 2: In Which the Center Cannot Hold


My flight was supposed to have arrived seven hours ago. Because of the delay, which left me sitting on the floor of the Ft. Lauderdale airport cursing under my breath for most of the afternoon into evening, I'm just now pulling up to the front of the modest two-story apartment in Astoria. At one in the morning. The street, which is silent at this hour, looks and feels unnervingly different from the one I left almost three months ago. It was still winter then. The trees protruding from evenly spaced squares carved out of the sidewalk on either side of the street were eerie and skeletal the day that I took my infant daughter away from this place and off to Miami. That was the day our family officially fractured, likely never to be repaired. A month ago, I returned here with my little girl, Inara, and left her behind while I traveled back to my sad exile in South Florida. But I'm not thinking about that now. I can only remember that cold morning in April, when I kissed my wife goodbye and realized that it would probably be the last time I kissed her at all.

I heft my bag out of the cab, slam the door shut and watch as hot-red taillights disappear down the darkened street, leaving me standing there -- alone. I turn and face the home that isn't my home anymore. The place where my wife Jayne and I once hoped to make a life with our child. The place that's now hers and only hers. Closing my eyes and taking a deep, long breath, I force myself forward, onto the sidewalk and up the steps to the front door. She's left it unlocked for me. As I step inside and pull the door closed behind me, I can already make out the familiar points in the landscape of what was once my living room. At the same time, though, my mind and body involuntarily read the changes that have been made since I first left, and the result throws my equilibrium off. The surreality of the intimately recognizable and the thoroughly alien side-by-side. The life that somewhat resembles mine but most definitely isn't mine anymore.

I climb the stairs gently, trying not to make noise that might wake Jayne or the baby. The upstairs landing is lit only by a timid yellow glow coming from the bathroom. I place my bag in the room I'll be sleeping in for the next few days -- what used to be Inara's nursery, before Jayne moved the crib and changing table into her own room to accommodate a potential full-time nanny -- and take another few deep breaths, trying to work up the courage to finally see my daughter and wife after what feels like an eternity.

A few hesitant steps across the hall and I slowly push open the bedroom door, revealing the shadowy space beyond. A tousle of Jayne's chestnut hair peeks out from under the Calvin Klein comforter -- our comforter, the one we've had for years. In the rosewood crib, Inara sleeps soundly -- her tiny body rising and falling with each steady breath. I reach out to touch her, then think the better of it, instead bringing my hand up to my mouth to stifle a forlorn sigh. I close my eyes for the slightest moment and projected on the inside of my eyelids, in my mind, is the alternate universe I had hoped to one day inhabit with these two women -- my true loves. A world where I never missed a moment of Inara's life. Where Jayne and I were devoted husband and wife. Where there was light, instead of all this endless, impenetrable darkness. I open my eyes again, and that darkness is still there. I'm a ghost, standing in the middle of this perfectly still room. No one can see me or feel me. No one even knows I'm here. Forgotten, but not gone.



I burned my first marriage to the ground. Doused the whole thing in gasoline and torched it. There were times while I was doing it that I agonized over the choices I was making and the almost certain consequences they would have, but it was never enough to make me rethink the direction I'd chosen to move in. My goal wasn't specifically to destroy my wife, the woman who loved me -- her name was Abby -- but it's not as if that exculpates me in the wake of my admittedly heinous crimes.

I cheated on Abby. Cheated publicly in a way that left her utterly humiliated in front of those closest to her. Stuck the knife into her as hard and deeply as I could and callously shrugged as she gasped in shocked horror at what the man she loved was capable of. It wasn't that I didn't care about her. It wasn't that at all. It was that I cared about myself so much more.

The worst thing about it?

To this day, I can't really explain why I did what I did.

The easy answer is that I was young and, yes, staggeringly narcissistic. A rotten, cocky son-of-a-bitch more than a little obsessed with his own supposed charm. But there's more to it than that. There has to be. And I've spent years trying to nail it down because I worry that if I can't, I'll always be a hair's breadth away from doing it all over again. At the time, there were those who tried to console me with the usual platitudes about how there had to be something wrong with the relationship to cause me to betray, in such devastating fashion, the woman I purported to care for. The reality, though, is that there was nothing wrong with the relationship between me and Abby. Nothing at all. In fact, I loved her, or so I told myself, as much as it was possible for one person to love another. Abby and I had an attachment to each other that even now seems slightly otherwordly. We were more than lovers, partners, boyfriend-girlfriend and eventually husband and wife -- we were good friends, and we were even more than that. There was never a moment that I felt anything but completely comfortable around her; she was like home from the moment I met her, and our passionate and primal connection never dissipated -- not even after I tried to beat it to death with a sledgehammer.

What I did damaged Abby incalculably, it would leave her emotionally scarred for years. But despite that, she tried to forgive me and, in the short term, attempted to repair our marriage; long term, she kept in contact with me, offered a shoulder to cry on when I needed it, a sharp mind to bounce ideas off, a kind voice on the other end of a telephone line and, occasionally, a bed in which to spend a night forgetting about everything but her. Put simply, she was that rare breed which provides the one thing every married man or woman wishes and hopes for: unconditional love. A loyalty that isn't naive or simple-minded but is indomitable precisely because it's based on a firm knowledge of the truth, in all its ugliness. Abby knew full-well what she was getting herself into with me -- and she loved me anyway.

Whether or not we could have lasted had I not screwed things up so badly, who knows. I'm inclined to think that what made our relationship so special was its position -- the time and place -- in each of our lives. We were kids. Kids lead lives filled with gloriously impetuous passion and thoroughly unrealistic expectations.

In the end, regardless of everything -- or maybe because of it -- Abby and I split up.

That was marriage number one for me. There have been two more since. I'm 39 years old. Billy Joel is a fucking amateur.

The dramatic arc of my second marriage, to Kara, is well-documented. Suffice it to say, she didn't want to be married from the very beginning -- and what happened between us was more wishful thinking on both our parts than anything else. It ended in absolute catastrophe. Enough said.

The good that came from my short-lived marriage to Kara was always crystal clear in my mind: It led me, in more than simply a roundabout way, to Jayne. On the map of quantum moments in my life -- choices and even missteps small and large that altered my trajectory -- you can draw a direct path to Jayne. And for a very long time, that filled me with more joy than I ever could've imagined. That's because Jayne was a revelation. The first truly adult relationship I ever had. The first one I gave myself over to completely, committing to absolutely.

What I felt for Jayne, I've never felt for another human being. Ever.

Throughout our seven year relationship and five year marriage, she and I have seen ups and downs, trials and triumphs. I've made mistakes and have on more than one occasion kept things hidden from her that I should've been honest and forthcoming about. Once again, everybody lies, but that doesn't stop me from believing that I shouldn't have -- about anything. There's no excuse, and the ones I used to cling to -- the typical bullshit I peddled to myself in an attempt to rationalize my own feckless guile -- don't hold an ounce of water. In spite of those mistakes, however, I remained faithfully committed to the relationship. Always. I took our vows seriously, maybe even more than others might have because I had actually been through two bad marriages before. I believed in "for better or for worse."

And so did Jayne -- to an extent, I suppose.

That's where the specifics will end.

There's no point in getting into gruesome detail about who did what to whom. Many of our transgressions against each other -- Jayne's and mine -- have been alluded to in the past. The end result is all that really matters, and that result is, ironically, the same as my last two marriages. I say "ironically" because my relationship with Jayne was so much more committed and so much stronger than anything I'd experienced before, and yet it all turned out strangely the same. Worse, in fact -- because this time there's a child involved. A little girl who was born just eleven months ago. Sometimes it's impossible to wrap my head around it all; the gravity of what's happened is too daunting to fully grasp.

If years ago you had told me that Jayne and I would eventually end up in the position we're in right now, I would've laughed out loud. That's how strong my faith was in us. Then again, if you had told me years ago that sweet, outwardly devoted Jayne was capable of doing some of the things she did during the second half of our marriage, I would've laughed even harder. I say this not to in any way shame her -- only to make a couple of necessary points: First, that anyone can screw up a marriage; even the most seemingly committed and genuinely kind-hearted can destroy trust from the inside out. Second, and maybe more alarmingly but certainly more pertinent when put in the context of a dedicated relationship, that I'm not sure we ever really know anyone. If you believe that everybody lies to some extent and harbors their own secrets (and I do) then it stands to reason that you'll never know someone thoroughly. That isn't a problem as long as, say, you never promise to love anyone for the rest of your life.

And what about that promise -- the one that's the very foundation of the marriage vows?

In our hyper-fragmented, single-serving, ADD culture, is it really possible to predict with any certainty that what you want now is what you'll want in ten years? Or even five years? Or five months, for that matter? Is it possible for two people to honestly grow together, in the same direction, when every bit of the daily kinetic whirlwind we inhabit at the beginning of the 21st century seems designed to pull us in a thousand different directions at once? How do two people remain in a consistent state of grace? These days, with all the choices we've been inundated with, most of us can't commit to watching one TV show for longer than a few minutes without getting bored -- and yet we're expected to decide on one person to be with for the rest of our lives?

The reality, of course, is that we don't have to decide on one person -- even if we do choose to get married. Sure, millions of us take the vows. We say the words "til death do us part." But obviously, that's more of a suggestion than an actual contract. For far too many people it's a ritual with almost no meaning or muscle behind it anymore. The "Starter Marriage," occasionally lasting all of a few months, is practically a punchline at this point, while ditching the obligation and responsibility of a long-term commitment is as simple as packing a bag, walking out the door, and making a phone call to a lawyer the next morning.

Just how far have we lowered the bar when it comes to marriage in our culture? Let's put it this way: A lot of people these days seem intent on reassuring me that my five year legally sanctioned stint with Jayne was a success because it lasted as long as it did. At the risk of getting all pedantic, neither Jayne nor I are dead -- and I certainly don't remember taking her hand five years ago and saying "til one, or both of us, gets sick of putting up with the other" do we part.

Maybe our overall relationship, in time, will be judged a success. Make no mistake, though: Our marriage will never be.

If a five year marriage can be heralded as a victory, we as a society have very serious problems.


It's a cool, sunny morning and Inara's wearing the little overalls I bought for her last month while we were in Miami. She's crawling up the hall, toward me, a huge smile spread across her face. A few moments ago, she was standing and walking -- only resorting to a high-speed crawl after tripping over her own feet. I'm laying on the floor across the length of what used to be her nursery, urging her on as she races forward. When she crosses the doorway, I reach out and grab her, sitting up and pulling her in close for a hug. She laughs as I do this. I close my eyes and stroke the back of her head -- the wispy curls now growing there. I say nothing. I barely even breathe. I don't want anything to interrupt the sound of her laughter. I keep my eyes closed, because I know that if I open them the world around me will just be blurred by the tears forming in my eyes. So I listen -- and I once again imagine that alternate universe. The one where this moment goes on and on. Where I'm never apart from the little girl in my arms. Or her mother, who I wish I wasn't still in love with.


"Better make sure you're looking closely -- before you fall into your swoon."

-- Silversun Pickups, There's No Secrets This Year

"It's not going to stop. It's not going to stop. It's not going to stop 'til you wise up."

-- Aimee Mann, Wise Up


Part 3: In Which Mere Apathy is Loosed Upon the World


There's already someone new. That's what she's essentially saying. When I had no idea what was going on -- when the very thought of Jayne and someone else was simply too preposterous to fathom when contrasted with her effusive expressions of love and loyalty -- the reality was even more terrible than I could've imagined. If she's now willing to actually admit that there's someone she may be interested in -- a partner in a Manhattan law firm, a Harvard grad -- then I have to assume that a courtship of some sort is already well underway. I shouldn't be shocked, and yet, strangely, I am. Even after all this time, with everything that's happened between us, it's nearly impossible to reconcile the Jayne I knew just a few years ago with the woman now standing in front of me in the kitchen of what was once our shared apartment -- the woman who seems barely willing to mourn the death of our marriage, whose veins run with liquid nitrogen when it comes to me. The cognitive dissonance is just too great. In some ways I respect that she's made decisions within her own mind and is sticking by them; in others, I consider the times in our recent history when we looked each other in the eyes and admitted that we were worth working to save and that there was too much there to simply toss aside. I think of what each of us has forgiven -- or at least claims to have.

Somewhere along the line, Jayne changed -- drastically. So did I, I suppose. Although which one of us changed for the better, if either of us did, could be debated endlessly.

She brushes past me and strides cooly into the living room -- says she doesn't want to talk about it anymore. This is the first time I've even casually brought up the subject of "us" in the two days that I've been here. And this is how it's responded to: with palpable irritation preceded by the acknowledgement of a potentially budding relationship with someone I've never met and maybe never will. Not that it's really my place to effect a tone of anger, sadness, hurt, what-have-you over such developments anymore. This was, to an extent, decided for me at some point recently -- without my even knowing it.

My shoulders slump slightly, as if all the tension in the room had been resting squarely on my back until Jayne finally walked away, lifting it. Leaving me standing there by myself -- with Inara crawling over my feet.



I keep wondering when the indentation around my left ring-finger is going to disappear. It's been almost two months since I took off my wedding band and, amazingly, tragically, its imprint on the area where it was once worn so proudly remains. It's like I have a permanent symbol of my marriage to Jayne on my finger -- which would be a very romantic notion had my marriage to Jayne been anything approaching permanent.

Throughout the course of our seven years together, I bought Jayne three separate engagement rings. The first was a gorgeous, princess-cut diamond in a vintage art deco setting. It was thoroughly originally while remaining classic and understated, and I knew it was the right ring for her the moment I laid eyes on it. While working late one night before we even got married, Jayne took off the ring to wash her hands and accidentally left it in a public bathroom; by the time she realized she'd forgotten to put it back on, the thing was probably well on its way to a 24-hour pawn shop. She was a wreck when she called to tell me -- crying uncontrollably and apologizing. I took it in stride and replaced the ring a month later with one that, while much more impressive, never really affected me the way its missing predecessor had. I eventually wound up springing for a third ring after a particularly traumatic event in our life as a married couple. I figured it would be a good way to consecrate our decision to recommit to each other -- the perfect representation of putting the past behind us and looking only toward the future.

What's interesting, though, is that for all the value and significance I placed on the ring that I put on Jayne's finger -- any of the rings, including her wedding band -- there always seemed to be a steady procession of men for whom her ring, and what it symbolized, meant absolutely nothing. I never took any sort of "deterrence factor" into consideration when deciding what to slip on Jayne's finger. I never deliberately chose something whose light was so bright that it would send the cockroaches -- or maybe wolves would be a better metaphor -- scurrying back to their holes. But to many men, many married men, the ring on her finger meant as little as the ones on their own. They wanted my wife to betray her husband just as they wanted to betray their own wives, and they were completely comfortable using every weapon in their charmingly romantic arsenals to make fantasy into reality. This kind of thing happened with shocking, enervating regularity.

Men who wanted to cheat on their wives -- with my wife.

No matter how many times I say it -- or how many different ways -- it still has the same sickening effect someplace deep inside me. It makes me feel like I need to take a shower.

I never truly understood the feeling of not simply betrayal but violation -- of everything you believe in, everything you hold dear, your sense of safety and self -- that invariably goes hand in hand with an affair, with the discovery of an entire life lived in secret. If I had, I don't think I ever would've hurt Abby the way I did. I couldn't have walked the earth in peace, safe in the knowledge that I was essentially a good person, if I had fully understood the consequences of what I was doing and still chose to do it anyway. No amount of rationalization would've provided safe harbor for my soul.

The fact is, however, that aware of the repercussions or not, millions of married people cheat. They cheat with other married people -- or with singles. They cheat with their secretaries, the people they meet at the bar, the next-door neighbor, the impressionable, and impressable, younger girls or guys they see every day -- the ones who are wonderfully free of the ability to remind them of the biggest impediments to their own egos: demands, expectations, responsibilities. We lie and cheat, in one way or another and for one reason or another. It's what humans do. The question is whether our individual marriages survive the desires that lead us to want to sleep with and seek comfort from other people (whether we're successful at doing so or not).

It seems like there's always someone else somewhere.

I have a family friend who died late last year in Chicago; he and his wife were married for more than 40 years -- an astonishing feat by any standard. But while you'd be quick to hail their union as an example of a marriage that worked, and while I have absolutely no doubt that their love for each other was incredibly strong, certain recent events have given me more to think about than I probably would've liked. A few months ago, my friend's widow inadvertently ran into a man you might call a proverbial "old flame." Apparently, the guy in question is someone she once cared for very much -- before she got married -- and as, yes, fate I suppose, would have it, they wound up hitting it off. I realize that this kind of thing happens quite a bit and that it's usually looked upon with nary a critical eye; in fact, it's typically canonized, told as a tale of true love enduring across time and distance. But what about the husband with whom she spent 41 years? Did he know that somewhere deep down, the woman he loved may have burned for another man -- that this other man at least crossed her mind on more than one occasion? I realize that we are actually human and don't shut down completely when we choose to be with one person, but what does something like this say about the authority, the necessity, of marriage?

And does it prove something else: that since we can obviously love more than one person at once, can we in fact love almost anyone if we put our minds to it -- rendering the entire concept of one-man-one-woman-forever-and-ever marriage utterly meaningless? We come together and pledge eternal love, then we split up, or one of us dies, and we eventually come together with someone new and do it all over again. We're always told that it's not the same, that each relationship has its own definitive markers, but if this is true -- then doesn't it still diminish and devalue the textbook definition of what marriage is supposed to be? When love can be transferred relatively easily from one person to another -- whether through a passionate affair or simply moving on in the wake of disaster -- is there any sense of safety left in the institution?

I was forced to spend almost every day of my relationship with Jayne trying to convince and assure her that what I felt for her was real. That what I felt for her was in fact stronger and more "true" than anything I'd experienced before. I did everything I knew how to do -- undertook Sisyphean errands both large and small. Made sweeping gestures and did the littlest things. Still, ironically coming from the kind of person Jayne claimed to be, I was constantly, bitterly reminded that I was married before. Loved before. Had, I suppose, said and done it all before.

I can't even imagine, nor do I want to, the height of the bar I'm going to have to hurdle should I ever actually find myself caring for someone again. Three marriages creates a pile of baggage even Superman couldn't leap.

Not that I'm concerned about caring again at the moment.

My previous divorce, from Kara, although an incredibly painful ordeal, can now be looked upon as quaint compared to what's ahead for me in the wake of my break-up with Jayne. The reason, one among many really, is that while Kara hurt me, the wreckage of my relationship with her didn't fundamentally change the way I looked at the world. Kara wasn't all women, and I knew that. A divorce from her wouldn't mean, in my mind, that every woman on the planet wasn't to be trusted. I knew damn well what Kara was about when I met her; I knew that an ugly split from her would be in the cards the minute I crossed her (which looking back on it makes me very, very foolish and myopic, like those people who live on cliffs in Malibu hoping they'll never get a half-inch of rain). When Kara and I imploded, I didn't look at every woman who expressed an interest in me and say, "Well, she'll just devastate me the way my ex did."

But Jayne...

When I met Jayne, she was the sweetest, kindest, and most genuinely compassionate woman I'd ever had the pleasure of knowing. Someone who seemed to read me inside out and know precisely the right thing to say and do and when to say and do it. I could spend hours trying to adequately put into words the feeling she and I had in each other's presence. I could relate in pure poetry how I remember every single detail about so much of our time together, particularly at the beginning. I could tell you how surely I knew it was right. How I never doubted my love for her or hers for me, not for a second. How she was my best friend. I could do all of that and yet it still wouldn't be as convincing as I knew it to be in my heart and head.

I didn't want to get married again. But I absolutely wanted to marry Jayne. Honestly, and I say this with complete conviction: If she wasn't the right person, no one was. If I were to meet her today, I would say the exact same thing.

At least I would have if what eventually became of her and us hadn't.

The truly disheartening legacy of the end of my marriage to Jayne is what it's done to my peace of mind -- my willingness to trust not only others but myself. I believed Jayne absolutely, to the point of naivete even, and in the end everything I thought I knew about her, about us, was false. It's one thing when you're bitten by a snake -- quite another when you're eaten alive by a teddy-bear. By your best friend. How do you learn to trust again? What do you do when you believe that the next time, even years from now, when someone accuses you of a having a "fear of commitment," your answer will almost surely be, "No, I don't fear commitment. I just know that it's a crock of shit"?

For now, what I do is something I've never done before: not care at all.

I've never been a true cynic. An honest-to-God, devil-may-care misanthrope. I'm afraid that I may become one now. It's easier and smarter and will, I hope, keep me safe from harm. I have actually changed drastically. In ways I never wanted to. I always liked that I believed. That I had faith in love.

Now I just feel like I don't ever again want to hand someone the gun used to shoot me -- the power to leave me lost and in pieces and forced to rebuild from the ground up. I don't want anyone to be able to make a decision about my life over which I have no control. I realize how this sounds. Unrealistic at best. Ridiculous at worst. And I'm sure some will scoff at this notion and chalk it up to the predictable rhetoric of the freshly broken-hearted.

But if it makes no sense to give up on love now, when will it?


Jayne's bouncing the baby on her hip as I toss my overnight bag onto the backseat of the idling Town Car. I wipe my hands on my jeans, turn around and meet the eyes of my wife. She cracks the tiniest of bittersweet smiles -- I return the wistful look, simultaneously trying to quash the desperate emotions tearing me up inside. The ones that make me want to grab her and my child, hold them both tightly, tell Jayne that I refuse to give up and that I don't care about the better judgment of either of us -- that I'll fight to the death to save our family. I allow myself one last glimpse of that alternate universe. Then I push it out of my mind -- watch it dissolve and blow away like dust. This is my reality. It's not the reality I longed for -- the one we promised each other -- but it's the one I've been given. I never wanted to be selfish again, not after so willingly moving in the opposite direction. Not after learning the joy of putting my wife and my daughter above everything. Everything. But as I hug Inara one last time and force myself not to run a hand through Jayne's hair -- here on this sidewalk in Astoria, New York -- I realize that I have no choice but to think of myself for a while. To go back to concentrating on surviving. Detatching. Moving on. Loving my daughter, but moving on. Inara is wearing my favorite pair of her pajamas -- they have little gray elephants on them with the inscription "Once Upon a Dream" written in dainty script.

Once upon a dream.

I turn from my family, close my eyes in the hope of holding back the tears, and get into the car -- waving absently one last time and closing the door.

A few minutes later, as the car glides silently past St. Michael's Cemetery on the way to Laguardia Airport, I take off my sunglasses, rub the tears out of my eyes with my thumb and forefinger, and watch the gravestones through the fence as they flicker by. There are angels atop many of them. Dozens and dozens of angels, their heads turned downward. Their eyes are all closed, though. They see nothing.

88 comments:

Anonymous said...

I hope you are getting a huge catharsis out of this, because it is a huge steaming pile of crap. Boo-hoo your marriage failed, so marriage is a passe concept. Another marriage failed, and a high profile one, oohh more grist for the wheel of sorrow. Sorry, love and marriage are not dead. I know you'll flame me for saying so, and for posting anonymously, big deal I'm sure your forty or so ass-kissing followers will help you with that. I get it, you are bummed out over not seeing your daughter all of the time and that sucks. I don't pretend to understand what you are going through and yes I have three kids of my own. I'm not going to tell you everything is going to be o.k. once again you have tons of mindless followers to tell you that already. Love beats hate, light beats dark, and knowledge trumps ignorance. Mindless tripe?

Hex said...

Well put, and touching to read -- even as I don't know (or have any need to pry) the details of your recent personal experiences that link you (and me, and many, many others) to these questions.

I look forward to part II.

Chez said...

Yes, Anon. Mindless tripe indeed.

But you're entitled to your opinion.

Wes said...

So on one side there's the hopeless romantic, and on the other is the jaded, bitter skeptic? There's gotta be a middle ground right? RIGHT? Maybe I'll just play stupid and be blindly optimistic. Maybe love and romance doesn't give a shit about the relationship you're in? So romance exists, but it can be heartbreakingly awful, hurtful and immoral sometimes? My nose is bleeding. FUCK! Guys, this love thing is complex. We should just go get drunk.

Grim said...

Just because I have a bit more to say on the subject than a comment field allows...

http://www.grimnews.net/2009/07/what-is-love/

Hang in there, Chez.

-Grim

Suzy said...

i think it's ok for some people to feel burned and disenchanted with love and marriage. the same way i think it's ok for someone like me to have found in my relationship with my partner a shot of salvation from feeling hopeless. marriage and the degrees of love that make it happen don't have to apply to everyone in some standard form.

Tara Parker said...

Chez,

People that cheat aren't worth the air they take up. Not everyone does it. I would dare say that most people actually believe in keeping their word and honor their commitments.

That's what marriage is to me. A promise - commitment. If one feels at some point they are unable to hold up their end, they should GET THE FUCK OUT and not cheat.

Seems like a bunch of 5-year old's running around with impulse issues.

rikkitikkitavi said...

To paraphrase some famous guy, our failures lie not in our stars, dude, but in us. I'm pretty sure the original said "dude."

This argument sounds like "I couldn't finish that marathon, so we better cancel all the marathons. Don't anyone run any marathons because you'll fail." As opposed to, you know, being mature enough to refrain from starting one until you're ready, i.e., trained and disciplined.

And I'm throwing stones at my own house here. I had a bad first marriage because I was too immature and self-absorbed to get married. Shouldn't have done so. But I remarried once I had figured out what I could offer another person, what I needed, and what I could and couldn't put up with. This second one certainly appears to be forever; very rewarding and fulfilling. I was careful and honest and found someone with the same approach.

Let's not take the shallow, facile approach in blaming a social institution for our own shortcomings. Let's be careful about how we treat it and train our kids to do the same. Marriage isn't for everyone, but it is for some people.

Anonymous said...

Anon950: It's Chez's blog. He can write what he wants

Grim: great entry. Here here here to all of it.

TP: It's so cute when people simplify complicated issues to a child's level. I'm glad that works for you but I think Chez is taking is taking this to a higher level. and if you read his book you might realize that he hasn't been exactlly innocent either. but the real question is "who is?" despite what you seem to think.

Chez: looking forward to part 2.

Heather Hansma said...

Here is one of your 40 or so ass-kissing followers.

I don't agree with you on this one. You sound like Dan Savage except his focus is monogamy and not marriage in particular. I like you both a lot, but I don't think that because marriages can (and do) fail that they are pointless.

The parachute analogy has a major flaw. The reward in that scenario would be that you get to continue living. The risk is death. In marriage the reward is life-long love. The risk is being heartbroken and having to try again.

Vermillion said...

Hmmmm. It's funny. I was listening to the radio the other day (yeah free radio still alive) and the host was talking about the upswing in swingers' club and multi-partner relationships. Of course,t here were the few God-spouting ravers saying such things were sick and wrong, and how marriage is divine as so on and so forth.

But the host calmly explained his position: he felt that there are indeed certain people who are monogamous, and certain people who aren't. But they aren't honest about it. Instead of sitting down with their partner and trying to both understand where they are emotionally, they hem and haw and avoid any real talk until something goes wrong. If more people were honest about what they wanted from a relationship form the outset, then what would be the worse thing that would happen? They break up? That would happen eventually.

That is what I am getting from this story and your post, more than "marriage is bad": if you really care about someone, be fucking honest. Don't play games, don't try to protect their feelings, just don't be an asshole period. All you are doing is making it hurt worse.

Tara Parker has a point: if you really feel that torn about your feelings, the best thing for everyone is to at least separate and see if it is what you really want. This isn't a game, so don't try to play it like one. Just focus on what you really want, and be honest. Somebody is going to be hurt no matter what, so you can at least mitigate the pain before it gets worse.

And there is a difference between "everybody lies" and "everybody has to lie". they don't. And the sooner they realize it, the better.

Anon 9:50: Unlike some others, I will not respond to your post with an insult. In fact, I do hope your relationship is as strong as you believe it to be. As you can see (if not understand), not everyone can make such a claim, which was Chez's point. I just ask that, before you throw another stone, you really think about it. That's all.

e said...

I think the point is, marriage isn't what causes a relationship to crash and burn. It might put extra strain on certain personality types, but in the end, the people involved are the ones who screw it up. That being said, to each his own, I believe marriage doesn't work with some people, and thats fine, as long as the person they're in a relationship feels the same way. My uncle has been in a long term relationship for over a decade, and marriage is not on the horizon, but we believe my aunt loves him, and its their choice. It doesn't mean we throw everything out the window.

Tara Parker said...

To Anon. 11:42:

I wasn't cutely simplifying anything. I was pointing out that people who cheat have poor impulse control.

I have read Chez's book, BTW. What I said has nothing to do with whether or not he's been "exactly innocent". Each person makes their own choices.

Jeremy S. said...

what rikkitikkitavi said...i've read the book a couple times actually and from the outside looking in, rikki seems to have the more astute observation here...

Kevin M. Hagerman said...

I'm fucking anonymous' wife.

em said...

Maybe this is just the zombie ass-kisser in me, but I think the message of the post isn't "let's get rid of marriage", but "let's at least be honest about what kind of shit could go down once this happens".

While I haven't been married yet (close to it, long story, it's complicated to say the least), as someone who's been one party in a situation like this, you've summed up everything I felt about it (and the Sanford case) completely. And while I still somewhat believe that love can withstand all of the shit that life throws at two people, a huge chunk of me now believes that it simply isn't true--that people, no matter what, are either going to just change too much on their own, as separate people within the same couple, or they are just going to end up wanting "more" than what they have. I'm sorry you don't believe that anymore, Chez. Hang in there.

Stevie said...

It's been some considerable time since I visited your Blog and you have not dissappointed me. It's the nature of these things that I started to read yours once again as I rediscovered the joys of writing my own. I'm very glad to see you still about, and particularly pleased to see you are now a 'real' author! I started writing my own first novel a few months ago, a typical result of the standard "I could write a book" we all have at some time, but I'm 45'000 words in and still passionate about it so I see that as a good sign!

Very pleased to be reading your blogs again, good luck with everything my friend!

catlady said...

Methinks Anon9:50 doth protest too much?

Chez, we'd all wish what you have to say were not true, or at least we wish that there weren't some truthfulness in it, but the fact is that we all build illusions, and some of us are just lucky that they don't shatter.

Another of your 40 "followers."

Deborah said...

My marriage failed, not because of infidelity but...trust issues, nonetheless. I know a few people with enviable marriages...and mine would never have been like theirs, because the man who divorced me, feeling he was unable to trust me any longer (drug problem) had, in all reality, never trusted me to begin with. We had NOTHING JOINTLY HELD. NOTHING. HIS decision. Well, it made the divorce easier...on him. Anyway. My sister, unmarried @ 41, thinks that "good" marriages...you know, where the spouses are best friends, confidantes, lovers, etc...are a rare, rare thing. I used to NOT think that, but now I do. But, is it a question of expectation? This, of course, is one of the main reasons my marriage failed. There is no one out there who can, or should, complete someone else. And, when this didn't happen for me, I was SO disappointed. In hindsight, I had expectations that were too high, especially with the wary, wounded individual whom I married.

winged unicorn said...

love can last a lifetime, perhaps even forever. that doesn't mean it won't change into something other than what it started as.

if both peopel change in the same direction, all well and good. if they don't...

well, if they don't...

and there is no compromise, no possible meeting of the minds, betrayal so egregious, chasms made, lungs choked with lava...

you still have to change, even if it parting.

does that negate what came before?
no.

i tell my girls, especially my 19 and 16 yo, that just because their dad and i are done, over, finished, we are still good friends, still love and adore the three of them, still ridiculously entwined with each other and we had a damned exciting amazing 30 odd years together. the last 4 being hell does NOT cancel what came before or stop us from being brave enough to dive into the future.

i might not go sky diving, but i'll go 160 miles on a bicycle.

will i make it? won't know unless i try, will i?

Anonymous said...

I can't reconcile myself with the approach many today are taking towards marriage. I particularly think those examples like the one with the parachute are completely misleading.

Marriage is not something that happens. It is something you willingly and knowingly enter into and which you shouldn't enter into if you are not sure you understand the consequences.

It is not fate or coincidence or somthing like that which ends marriages. It is again a conscious decision that one or both parts of the marriage make.

So to question the timeliness of the institution of marriage is the wrong thing to do. There are marriages which still work after 25 or 30 years, and there are also unmarried couples who stayed together this long. So it's not the institution of marriage, but the general ability and most of all willingness of people to put one person before everything else for the rest of your life. To make compromises (which means that everybody has to give up on something or give in to something or take second place at something).

Don't question marriage. It's the wrong target.

Peach said...

I also agree with a poster up there somewhere.
Those old people who are amazing and have withstood so much and are eachothers bestest friends are rare. It is not the norm. And yet, most of us believe it is.
And thus, we have some fucked expectations.

I think most marraiges give you companionship. Lifelong companionship and that's about as good as it's gonna get. Perhaps you will be that lotto winner and find your 'soulmate'. Perhaps you and your soulmate will change, grow and live together in some fairly perfect harmony.

But probably not.
Probably you're gonna feel like you settled. Or that the other one settled. Or that things are just 'okay'.
That pain will be numbed with children and their love. Or perhaps it will simply be dealt with.

In the Arab world (from which I came) we dont expect life to be happy. We certainly appriciate when it is, but it's not a given. Which is completely different to the American ideal that you have the right to persuit all the happiness you can handle. I think it's admirable.

But I also think it's naive.

Marraige is filled with so much expectation. I think, and I could be wrong, but I think Chez's point was that when you put so much expectation onto something that has a 50/50 chance of failing are you setting yourself up for a small death? Are we being honest with ourselves?

I dont think we are.
It doesn't mean marraige is evil, but a fairytale it is not.

Marsupialus said...

I don't know, Chez, to draw any conclusions about the success or failure of marriage from someone like Sanford seems misplaced. The guy is a seething cauldron of adolescent desires, the long-time repression of which has produced the Kabuki theatre we continue to see broadcast. By setting himself up as a paragon of moral rectitude, he has no direction to go but down into failure. He may need God's laws to protect himself from himself but I suggest if he'd followed his basic nature from the beginning there would have been a lot less heartache in the near environs. It's a lot like Mr. Widestance except without the self-loathing.

But I don't care that he fucked some woman in Argentina outside of his marriage. What I care about is that he conducted his affair using state funds and services which is probably illegal, that he simply abdicated his responsibilities as governor to service his penis which if not illegal is breathtakingly irresponsible, that he lied about it all and only came clean when caught breaking which commandment is that? and that he was quick to condemn others in similar circumstance which is the height of hypocrisy.

For all those reasons, he has to go -- from public life. He should do everyone a favor, most especially his family and resign.

He needs to be set free to pursue his muse, his Desdemona, his goddess. But we need to be set free from his sanctimony.

Austin said...

The issue isn't whether marriage is right or wrong. The issue is the assumption that marriage is right for everyone.

It's also not true that the only expression of true love is marriage, or that you can only love one person at a time, or that anything is right for everyone.

It's these assumptions, I think, that cause more problems than anything. Innocence comes from approaching the world without preconceptions. Stop worrying about how things "should be" and start enjoying them for what they are.

Anonymous said...

You are spot on in this piece.

I have not known anyone in my lifetime to be a couple and not harbor resentments about the other, either quietly, or not

Kudos for "everyone lies"

harsh, but true

human nature is what it is.



you got a cool parting gift with Inara though.

pknaack1 said...

Shit, I am a brusque, short-tempered, reclusive asshole who hates everyone and can't stand being forced to be in crowds of people and has maybe three real friends in the world; and yet as much as I want to tell everyone around me to fuck off so I can spend peaceful time alone, instead I accidentally found someone I can't live without. I can't help it.

We love other people because we have no other choice. I mean what are the options? Going through life alone? Blah. It sucks when it ends, but the good times weren't just "good" were they? The good times were downright fantastic and incredible, and that's why we do it, and that's why we will do it again.

Mart said...

I think marriage works when no one in the house is promiscuitous, and they do no have any debilitating habits or mental conditions. Otherwise, even if stay married, there is a lot of pain.

A difficult standard to meet.

margo said...

First thought- I love reading you while listening to your music selections, it is an awesome multi-sense experience.

second thought- you break my heart a little but in a good way. I'm now living through the first wave of friends divorces, it is hard to keep my ideas on romance. I've yet to get married but I still hope to but it does seem so hard and just getting worse somehow I still have hope for all of us.

third- don't stop writing

DragonIV said...

At the end of the day, Chez, you don't appear to be someone capable of a long term relationship (call it marriage if you wish). I base this entirely upon what I've read from you on this site since I first started reading it regularly more than a year ago.

By the same token, the 50% of us who stay married aren't burying our heads in the sand about the health of our relationships. Sure, I will grant you that no relationship is guaranteed--even the strongest union can be torn usunder due to the stress of a lost child or some other traumatic life event outside of simple infidelity. Even so, many people are able (and willing) to live with the same person for life.

I wouldn't write marriage off just yet, but certainly, it doesn't work for a great many people. That sucks--because it's hard to raise kids without such a social structure. Not impossible, just harder.

Marshall said...

I'm going on a year in marriage and all I got is hope. I won't say that it won't end just like I won't say it won't rain on a particular day next month because you just don't know. Not everything lasts. Not everything should last. Sometimes things have their end even when we don't want them to.

All I'll say is a jeremiad against marriage is almost beyond the point. Marriage promises more things than it can ever deliver and I can only imagine the pain upon its end, either through dissolution or death.

In the end though there are no arguments that are good for marriage or against. It seems the natural beginning and end to a successful courtship. It seems the proper way to raise a child. Its not either and yet it seems to aspire to something more. Even if it can't quite ever reach any height we thought that it would as we said our vows.

Deacon Blue said...

Chez, I want to key in on some of your conluding comments:
---------------------------
I want to believe in a love that lasts forever and can withstand anything -- the good times and bad. And for a long time I believed just that. I clung desperately, passionately to the fantasy that there was a "right person" and that being in a committed relationship with her or him -- while not without conflict, trauma, and a lot of hard work -- would be rewarding in immeasurable ways, because that person would bring out the best parts of you and you would do likewise.

I believed so strongly in that. I don't anymore.
-----------------------------

I agree that finding the "right person" (aka "soulmate") isn't likely. But there's so much else here that I don't agree with.

A love CAN last forever. The problem is that is doesn't necessarily continue in an unbroken stream. A love CAN withstand anything, but that doesn't mean it won't crack at times. I know this is going to probably be both a trite and dorky example, but shit, what the hell? How many times was the fucking U.S.S. Enterprise blown the fuck up? Yet it was rebuilt, because of what it symbolized. Many marriages are the same way. They do suffer critical damage, but that doesn't mean they aren't worth rebuilding.

Sure, the new incarnation will be different. You might not even like it as much. Or you might like it more. But that doesn't diminish it's value.

Winged Unicorn brought up a huge point in that it's not so much whether the marraige fails (or might fail) but what you get out of it. Were all your marriages nothing but pain? Didn't you get something special out of them? Didn't you have joys that are worth remembering, even if you have to remember the pain of "failure" as well?

I look at how much good you STILL have to say about Jayne. I look at how much you love Inara and treasure what you have there even though there is pain in that as well. Those are good things. They wouldn't have been possible outside of the marriage. OK, I suppose you and Jayne could have just lived together, but what's the difference? We still have a drive, except for the most anti-commitment among us, to commit in some way, be it moving in together or taking vows to each other.

In marriage, your spouse does bring out the best in you. And the worst sometimes. But even in failed marriages, I suspect a lot of them had love at their core and did much that was good for each person.

I do believe that going into marriage requires not only the knowledge that pain will crop up at multiple points, but that is MIGHT fail. I never went into my marriage expecting a fairytale. Neither did you, I think, despite your self-flagellation about believe in a "fantasy." There are times and arguments with my wife that make me wonder if one day we might split up.

But none of that negates that I love her and the journey is worth it. The end point might not be what we want and expect, but we are defined and shaped as much by our scars as we are by our victories.

ANY relationship has the capability to hurt us deeply. Marriage simply amplifies the things we already encounter in frienships and acquantainceships. It amplifies the good and the bad.

I think that the most we can shoot for and expect of most marriages is that there are many, many more good and neutral moments than there are bad ones, and that even a divorce isn't enough to expunge the good stuff from the record.

xoch said...

Everybody's already pitched in their two cents, so here goes....

Chez, if you're parachute fails you die. If your marriage fails you don't. I know you're hurting and this blog is cathartic for you but keep some perspective, please.

Now, cliched platitudes like it's better to have loved and lost than not have loved at all probably piss you off right now, but they've become cliches for a reason. 'Cause they tend to be true.

Something good came out of your marriage, and I'm not just referring to Inara. You had your good times, your wonderful times, and you grew as a person.

Don't kick yourself for having "fallen" once again. Rather, accept and even celebrate that for all your cynicism you are, in the end, an optimist (please don't kick me). You were brave enough to take a chance. And you might yet me brave enough once again.

Goggles Paesano said...

Once again, Chez, you've reduced me to tears. I'm also a 39-year-old male, and I can tell you that I appreciate fully how lucky I have been. My wife is my best friend, my two kids fill my days with light, and I'm so sorry that I can't share that with you. Love Inara, be a friend to Jayne, but most importantly, love yourself. in the immortal words of Jonathan Larson, "You'll never share in love, until you love yourself (I should know)." I spent almost thirty years consumed in self-loathing, and found happiness eventually. Maybe marriage is not for you, but never forsake love. And stop making me cry! Please hug Inara for me (I love that name, by the way).

Anonymous said...

Marriage can work, but it takes BOTH people feeling what you have professed to feel in your writing. It takes two people who are willing to love enough to risk being hurt and who are willing to stick it out and work it out when they DO get hurt. Unfortunately, it seems that so often only ONE of the spouses has that kind of committment.

hollygirl78 said...

I work as an obituary writer for a newspaper in a medium-sized city (pop. roughly 175,000). I write obits each and every day for people survived by their loving husband/wife of 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 55, 60, and in one case, 72 years.

I am living with the only man I've ever loved. We will likely get married eventually. Whether we do or not, I will love him until I draw my last breath. We will be together until he decides otherwise. He says he loves me the same way I love him, and I believe him, though I accept that this is something I cannot really *know*. I think that marriages likes the ones in my daily obituary writing life are ones where both people feel the way that I know I feel and believe that he feels.

So, it happens. But rarely.

Hang in there, Chez.

kanye said...

I burned my first marriage to the ground. Doused the whole thing in gasoline and torched it.

"Frank's Wild Years"...maybe?

I have a story, a long story, and I wish that I had the time to tell it, but...I've got a thing going; a project. That and, I don't really want to comment until I've had time to think. But, I'm reading.

Anyway, here's a song... it touches on some of the same things that you're currently writing about: Easy To Be Broken

Chez said...

If you pay close attention, I'm constantly putting little homages to artists I love in the stuff I write. Hell, there are at least three references to Ellis's Less Than Zero in DST alone.

strangelittlegirl said...

Thanks for all the Sia and Zero 7 references. Love it. As someone who is about to move out of the house I share with my boyfriend of two years (the person I thought I would marry, have children with), I'm realizing a lot of things. SO MUCH of a relationship's success depends on the balance of what each person wants and how much they are willing to give. It took me about a year to realize that he was never going to love me enough to give me the basics that I needed. It takes a great deal of strength to walk away, especially when you still love that person - especially when you thought your "one shot" at "forever" was with them. I'm about to move back to my hometown where everyone - EVERYONE I know is married with children...and I am no spring chicken.

So...I don't know. I don't know why some people can't seem to make a marriage or relationship work and others seem to have it so easy. All my relationships have gone down in flames, so while I'm a bit younger than you and there's not a marriage or child involved - I'm definitely asking a lot of the same questions. Hang in there, you and Jayne are both good people who deserve the best.

Terry Heaton said...

Chez, the thing about emotions is that they change. What "feels" right today isn't necessarily so tomorrow, and while it's cathartic to cleanse your emotions this way, you're going to look back one day and say that this was your ego, your illusions talking, not Chez. I know this, because I recognize the feelings, having been married four times myself. Of those four, I got it right only once, and here's the secret:

Love is a one-way street. It seeks not itself. It begins with the source of all love and flows through us to others. In so doing, that source fills us in a way that is most satisfying. That's why being "in love" is such a wonderful feeling; it has nothing to do with what we're receiving and everything to do with what we're giving. The moment we shut down that flow, we're dead.

Alicia and I had perfection in a relationship. Neither tried to be the other. The sun never set on our anger, for we made a quality decision early on that, no matter what was causing the pain, we would not close our eyes angry. She let me be a man, because she loved me, and I let her be a woman for the same reason. We weren't in each other's shit; we simply loved each other. Her tragic death three years ago ended that, but I cannot be cynical about love or marriage. That's because once you've tasted, experienced and practiced the real deal, you'll know that it's possible.

That keeps me moving forward, Chez, and I pray it gives you hope. As an addict, you know how dangerous your ego can be, but you also know how to overcome that. It's not what happens to us in Life that matters; it's how we react to what happens to us, for that's the only thing we control about anything.

I know you loved Jayne, and I'm sad for you. Grieve with all your strength, for that's the only way to get through pain's door.

Terry

gina said...

i have only theories about love, and can't tell you one way or another what is universally true (if such a thing exists). i've been in a lot of relationships; never married, no kids. i'm in what appears to be a good one at the moment, but my experiences tends to lend credence to these things having a shelf life, no matter how our dreams and hopes package it. all i know is that humans are odd, and fickle, and uneven, capable of beauty and cruelty.
your words touch and touch, and i mourn your loss.

namron said...

Chez, consider this as to your future marriage(s): I attended a rather boring party several years ago and met and old friend there who had been an horrific alcholic and drug abuser as a younger woman. She has gotten her fecal matter together over the years, became a licensesd therapist, and now enjoyed an extensive and sucessful practice. One of the guests related the story of her "nephew" who had been sent to drug rehabilitaion many times and relapsed just as many times. She turned to my friend, and using my favorite dumb-ass introduction, stated "I just don't understand why someone goes back to rehab a hundred times." My friend replied, simply, "maybe it takes 101 times to work."

celery said...

it's not surprising that the institution of marriage, and long-term relationships as a whole, are in crisis right now. it's a transition period for a set of social norms and roles that were widely entrenched and, in many cases, exploitative of one party.

it wasn't very long ago that women had no options in the workplace and could not control their own reproductivity. it also wasn't so long ago that it was legal to "rape" your wife, spousal abuse was socially acceptable and women were totally dependent on men for food and shelter.

as those things are changeing, so will marriage and our participation in it. the notion of marrying for love - a love that will equally benefit both parties- is relatively new. even though we've come far socially and economically, there are still huge strides to be made. when one half of the population is oppressed, they harbour warranted anger and suspicion toward the other half, and that can be misdirected toward an undeserving, relatively innocent individual. likewise, when one half of the population is raised surrounded by forces that encourage them to disrespect and objectify the other half, and not take their interests seriously, then it's no surprise that feelings of love for a member of that other half are sometimes overwhelmed or silenced when it comes to motivation for one's actions.

women and men will work it out. generations of sexism and certain barriers that prevented women (and in some ways, men) from flourishing can be changed quickly with laws, but the emotional politics will take longer, and involve lots of trial and error. hopefully the next generation will benefit from our well-meaning fucking up.

(this post is specific to male/female relationships, but in no way is meant to suggest that marriages have to be between women and men. hell, i'm canadian.)

slouchmonkey said...

Karl Malden was married 70 years.

Deacon Blue said...

@ slouchmonkey,

It was the nose, dude. I'm tellin' ya..

Anonymous said...

All this hand-wringing about marriage is making me laugh. You do realise that its only in the US where 50% marriages fail? Puts a bit of a dent in your "love is a crock- all marriages die" theory. The truth is, marriage is cultural- love is not.

I'm sorry you're hurting- I can't imagine too many situations harder than what you're going through now. Your writing is wonderful but the theme is a bit immature, to be honest.
Be well, Chez
Sara

Shannon from Saskatoon said...

You know, it is the luxury of a sheltered existemce to consider affairs of the heart so predominantly. Doesn't make the pain you are experiencing any less, but the point is that you have to toughen up if you plan to get old.

Every time I have had a case of arrested development, I get a hard kick up the arse. Which becomes perspective which becomes wisdom. I would still prefer happy endings and getting my way. It doesn't work like that, though.

I have 47 winters under my oversized belt. I also have a 20 year marriage that was too damn good to be true when it started and still is. No experience with that kind of good luck before this, though.

What I think I am saying is that you are 39 and you are entering another stage of your life. It's a time when self-absorption and focus on the dizzying aspects of love becomes untenable. The hammer of humility creates the apparatus for maturity and selflessness. Like elders, you know?

The question isn't about marriage, I suspect. It's about what to do when you are stranded and alone facing the abandonment of childish values. Adolescence 201 or something like that.

You present yourself as decent and idealistic. This is the bedrock of your persona, so give it some time.

randy said...

Thank you... I cried, but I thank you.

ephemerina said...

Y'know, I've been through the grinder more than once, and I guess I started out more like Abby, never really expecting the marriage to last. Ironically, marriage #1 fell apart because husband had all kinds of fears about being trapped by a conventional marriage, as if I was ever capable of that. At the time I told him that I would never make him quit being in a band to become an investment banker; rather, were I to be in a relationship with an investment banker I would probably entreat him to quit and join a band.

Marriage #2 was sidelined by an internet fraud that could be compared to Madoff, only with emotions instead of money (although money was involved too). The convoluted bullshittery took me from sudden, devout believer in Twue Wuw, in the purest, non-superficial sense, to an incredibly suspicious cynic of all things love-related. I was brought back to earth with such a thud that I was underground for a while.

Now, a few years on from that and I feel almost level again. I can offer you this: if I can find someone to live with that I don't want to throttle on a daily basis, well, isn't that part of what love is? Compatibility? I've never subscribed to the notion that romantic love is everlasting. Nor do I think that "working" at a relationship will save it. Understanding and acceptance of flaws is one thing, but there is a point where you have to stop administering CPR. Jenny Sanford needs to knock it on the head because her husband, amongst other things, is a tool. There's no amount of work that can go into this marriage that will make it savable in a way that will satisfy both of them.

So, what's the answer? Does there have to be an answer? I guess, make sure you like a person before you waste the energy on loving them. Oh, and make sure they really exist, too.

lakelady said...

since no one else has said it yet - Anonymous #1, Fuck off.

me - never married so I'll say little but I do believe that what Terry Heaton said is closest to the truth.

Chez, thank you again for writing that tugs at my heart and for sharing this snapshot of your moment in time. Remember it's only a moment and will shift again.

Barbara said...

I'm getting divorced after 22 years together, one year apart. It hurts terribly. But I don't regret it. We were the happiest couple ever for 15 years, and we made a lovely daughter. I don't know that I'd marry again, but I certainly hope to commit to a loving relationship again someday. Don't give up on that, it does exist, and even if it ends it is worth seeking.

Anonymous said...

I believed in "for better or for worse."
And so did Jayne -- to an extent, I suppose.

That's extremely generous.

Che Grovera said...

It's interesting to see the variety of lessons different people can draw from the same source material. Having been divorced three times myself -- and having alternately cheated and been cheated upon -- I think I can reasonably claim to have some familiarity with the emotional sandbox in which Chez now finds himself. In my case one (and possibly two) of the marriages should not have taken place, but I wasn't comfortable enough with myself to try to do anything differently. However, I believe the fault was mine and not the institution's -- and if I caved in to the pressure of unreasonable social norms then it's still my responsibility to recognize that and to work to overcome it. I don't know how one navigates life otherwise.

Anonymous #1 isn't entirely wrong, even if the approach and tone are loathsome. I find that the sweeping generalizations I draw about the hurricane while I'm in its eye are incomplete at best and inaccurate at worst, and that it's only after the storm is well past that my reflections have any merit, FWIW.

Felis Femina said...

I don't think it's necessary to tell Anonymous #1 to "Fuck off" just because he (or she) refuses to suck Chez's dick (metaphorically speaking, of course). Anonymous #1 makes a valid point and, quite frankly, I can't say I entirely disagree.

While I don't consider myself one of Chez's "ass-kissing followers", I tend to agree with much of what he says. In this case, however, I am on the fence.

I saw the pride and happiness that starting a family and building a life in our lovely little neighborhood gave Chez, it was wonderful to see. I'm truly sorry his marriage ended. I wish he could still be in NYC with his little girl.

On the other hand, it's true his is not the only marriage to fail, nor will it be the last. I have little tolerance for people wallowing in self pity (a fault of my own, I readily admit) but this is his blog and he can write whatever he wants whether people want to hear it or not. If every commenter who differs in opinion is told to fuck off, if the comments section is reserved for ass-kissing and ego-stroking only it would get pretty boring around here.

Chez is a big boy, I'm sure he can take a little tough love.

Deacon Blue said...

@ Felis Femina,

I wonder, though, how much Chez is willing to pay to have someone metaphorically suck his dick. I mean, it's not the kind of thing I'm into normally speaking, but I really could use the money...

Anonymous said...

chez, im going through a horrible break-up and i see no light at the end of the tunnel. still, i cant even imagine how you must be feeling. it helps to read your thoughts. it makes me feel a bit more human and a bit less alone. i hope you find a light soon.

Chez said...

I meant to post this over the weekend, but I really was nowhere near a computer:

To the person who left a comment under the name "T." -- I just couldn't print it. Although I appreciate the support, I'm doing my level best not to bash Jayne. I obviously allow the commenters a little more leeway than I do myself, but I just can't confirm that some what you say is true nor can I fully believe that it is. (If that makes me naive, so be it.)

Either way, thanks for writing. Feel free to e-mail if you'd like, but I can't put that kind of thing in a public forum.

Amy in Alabama said...

I haven't read all of the comments and have not fully read this post so this may have been brought up before but I have to say it.

It is possible that Jayne did not change, but your view of her has. I don't believe anyone as great as you described her in the past could become the person as you describe her today. You were blinded by love. She clearly is looking toward the future and you are trying to cling to what you thought were better times. move forward. Your relationship with Jayne will never be what it was. Even if you were to get back together, it will not be the same.

Hang in there.

Kat said...

A beautiful piece, Chez, and yet I am left with very little to say. Anything I would say would simply sound trite, and be more for myself and my desperate need to cling to hope after my own spectacular crash-and-burns. So I shall just say that I am sorry, and thank you for sharing this part of yourself.

Web Dunce said...

I'm sorry. I don't know what else to say. If we were friends maybe I could say something more relevant. I hope that writing this all down is helping you deal in some small way. Believe it or not, it's helping me cope with some big issues I'm having in my own 20 year relationship.

Calitri said...

I'm reading East of Eden and in the book there's a conversation that basically boils down to the concept that love and trust are mutually exclusive. And, honestly, to some extent I think the idea rings true. However, I don't think it negates marriage because the concept can be applied to any relationship in which you're emotionally invested from friendships to business transactions. There's always the possibility of getting hurt or betrayed. The possibility is simply magnified in a marriage because so much is invested. It's life and it sucks, but what are you going to do? Without the bad, how would we recognize the good (cliche? check).

And does it prove something else: that since we can obviously love more than one person at once, can we in fact love almost anyone if we put our minds to it -- rendering the entire concept of one-man-one-woman-forever-and-ever marriage utterly meaningless?

Quite the contrary actually. Though I doubt we could force ourselves to love almost anyone - as there are just some people who rub us the wrong way - there are certainly a whole host of possible connections, matches, couplings out there. The idea that there's one and only one person for everybody is beyond crazy. It's all about choice. Life,for that matter, is all about choice. It's what makes us human and sets us apart. The ability to choose one person from a sea of hundreds, thousands, millions to devote yourself and hopefully spend the rest of your life with is what makes marriage beautiful, meaningful, worthwhile and important.

People change. All the time, in fact. So will two people who were once intimately connected grow apart? Maybe. But, maybe, they'll grow together. It's 50-50 at any given instant but the odds skew every which way when looked at over a period of time. And really, just like everything else in life, there's an ebb and flow to growing together and apart. Sometimes they're happening at same time. Everything's a chance. Nothings a sure thing. Even if we boarded up our houses and apartments and vowed never to leave again, we couldn't escape chance. So, if you say marriage isn't worthwhile because there's a chance of failure, then you might as well stop living entirely because everything has a possibility of failure. Marriage in it's modern form still has a fairly high success rate when compared to a myriad of other life decisions we make in a day or lifetime.

It's seems you've covered a lot of bases in terms of approaches to marital relationships - the most recent seeming to be an unprotected, unrelenting openness verging on naivety. Since I haven't read your book yet I won't try to categorize the other two. Shoving any of them into box and labeling them probably doesn't do justice but I'm trying to speak in generalities. I just feel like there might be a middle ground in there somewhere that hasn't been touched. And maybe some day you'll feel like exploring that.

And for what it's worth, I don't think you'll ever be a true, honest-to-blog, cynic. You're much too self-aware for that.

Cheryl Robbins said...

Chez,

Really, being a little numb and apathetic right now is probably a good thing, right up there with endorphins and adrenaline making someone feel like they've been punched in the stomach when they've really been shot.

People in general are really good at making assumptions based on what is currently going on, feeling as though reality as we know it this moment will never go into unforseen territory. If this were not the case then I wouldn't have so many friends six feet under from self-inflicted gunshot wounds and broken hearts. All those guys assumed that at fifteen, twenty-one, and twenty-eight that the way they were feeling at that moment was an accurate indication of how they would feel for the next fifty years, without even having a conceptual grasp on what "fifty years" could mean, short-sighted. Hell, I wouldn't have made the same tattoo decisions back at eighteen and still rebelious as I would now, if I would get any at all.

I'm not calling you short-sighted any more than I would any other human being. However, you don't know what your experiences are going to be. You can't know beyond assumption how you are going to feel about much of anything in the future.

In terms of life, there are no rights and wrongs, no absolutes, no destinies. All we have are speculations, lessons, and convictions, also subject to change. The point is that very few people end up being exactly where they thought they would be in five, ten, or (insert number here) years. We don't know. You met Jayne when you weren't considering the idea of marriage and it changed your perceptions. This will happen again and again, your cup will continue to fill and empty for the rest of your life. Be patient. You will never be "yourself" again in past terms, but someone else equally as cool. Hunker down through the storm and all will be well again until the next one. No one ever gets a perfect "happily ever after", just decent and bearable existence. I'm thinking of you.

Suzy said...

chez, it's o.k. to be wrong. you were wrong about jayne and how perfect things were. how perfect your love was. when it's that perfect, it's usually not. just about everyone you know will give you a couple of hours of their time to tell you their own little version of the "i thought they were perfect" story. just about anyone who has loved as passionately as your words has had a relationship they thought was it.

and then got burned.

does this mean we go all 'michel foucault' on love and label everything a construction, like my zero tattoo? you can. but it ain't no way to live. survive, perhaps. but not live. it's a strategy to do that. but a lonely one.

there's a secret life all people have, and keep, and nurture, in and out of romantic relations. the secret life where you don't HAVE to abide by all the 'rules'. and i'm not talking about the physical. it's the secret life inside your head and your soul that keeps you, well, being you. from the silly to the unspeakable. this is where EVERYONE lies and cheats. but i take issue with the everyone lies and cheats in reality, so why bother assertion.

if you happen to find someone again (which i believe you will) and that person understands that there (in the secret life) is where we're so flawed, and you both allow yourselves that, then you'll be able to trust and love again. because that's real. that's honesty. to have someone who understands it's not perfect, but it works. that's when it becomes forever.

you will get there. you're smart enough to know that. and you'll get tired of the misanthrope strategy. you will.

largo said...

If you give up, the terrorists win.

Anonymous said...

My heart aches for you. I don't know you, but this piece brought me to tears. I think Amy in Alabama nailed it when she said Jayne didn't change at all, but your view of her did. I had a strong intuition she found someone else. The truth is, she is not a free woman. I don't think you are legally seperated. But more than that, moving on so quickly does not honor and respect what you had, what you shared, your marriage. You must feel like you have absolutely no say in your life. Life altering decisions are being made, and you don't even know about them! And, even if you did everything in your power to fight for your wife and family - for a love you so steadfastly believed in - it wouldn't matter. Her reactions to you seem icy and flippant. I can't even imagine the utter devastation and helplessness you must feel. I am so terribly sorry. I also cannot grasp why you were made to feel like you had to assure her everyday that what you felt for her was real? Wasn't she the one with the indiscretion(s)? That's a huge red flag, and proof that something was going to eventually go very wrong. I can completely understand why you want to totally embrace apathy. I'm sure pain of this magnitude will do that to you. But, I'm positive that won't serve you well either. Take this entire experience - the experience that shook you to the core and made you believe in love in the first place, - and hold onto it. You met and loved Jayne for this part of you to awaken. That's powerful, and cannot be wasted. Don't worry about romantic love at this time. Don't worry about whether or not you'll find it again. You've got such an abundance of talent, passion, creativity, love. Good things will happen again because you deserve them. Take care of yourself. Be good to yourself. We're always here for you.

Ally said...

I tried to blog this morning about my own experiences with this sort of thing, considering what Friday is, but all the words came out wrong.

You just never fully recover. You become smarter in ways, dumber in others, but you never get over it as if it never happened. You get close - I think I'm there. 99.9% over it. But there's always that tiny bit left.

What I discovered - it sounds like a load of manure, but it really is true - I discovered your life is what you make of it, during, and after, the hurt. If you want to believe marriage is dead, then that's what you do. If you want to go into a new relationship later with baggage, then that's what you do.

I was the kind of numb you describe for two years. I look back now, and it's mindboggling. That level of numb is dangerous. But it's also sort of necessary for certain people. A kind of "putting yourself back together" therapy.

You've got the tools to see yourself through this the right way. Like Hemingway said, "When you get the damned hurt, use it - don't cheat with it." That's the end of a quote about the motivations for writing. Like that Mayer song, it reminded me a lot of you, your situation, this morning.

R said...

Beautifully written. I couldn't keep my eyes dry for most of it, but the message you conveyed hit home in many ways for me.

I've always wondered myself if marriage was ever worth it. People around me have two and three divorces under their belts, and I don't ever want to experience that pain. (Perhaps that's why I am self destructive in most of my relationships.)

My only hope is that one day I can find peace in the future, and not be scared of what it hold. And I hope that when I do, I have a person who loves, and is as committed to me, as you to Jayne.

celery said...

being lied to over a period of time undermines the appearance of one's own sanity.

a big part of being insane or crazy (or whatever the pc term is for beyond the pale mentally ill) has to do with not being able to tell the difference between reality and fantasy. what it is to being rational, autonomous being is to make decisions about one's good based on full information. when someone denies you information crucial to the formation of your beliefs about the world and (especially) your place in it, then you end up forming a system of beliefs and behaviours that are based on fantasy, not reality. in other words, you're acting "as if" you're crazy. the realization of that, once the lies come out, is enough to make anyone feel like they really are crazy.

that's why lying/betrayal cuts to the core of our sense of dignity - and why, when the subjects of the lies really matters - we end up confused, lost and sure about absolutely nothing.

but i like to think that there are some honest people out there with integrity. if not, then at least there are dogs - beautiful, loving, home-needing dogs. adopting one is a great transitional step to reentering the realm of human intimacy. and inara would think that you're the coolest.

Riles said...

fucking heartbreaking

barlova said...

I'm with Amy in Alabama, and also Suzy. There's no way Jayne could have been the woman you imagined her to be until the split. How do you describe her?

she was the sweetest, kindest, and most genuinely compassionate woman I'd ever had the pleasure of knowing. Someone who seemed to read me inside out and know precisely the right thing to say and do and when to say and do it.

Chez, NOBODY is like that.

Here's what I think. I read, in a previous post, about how you met. You were in your early thirties, twice divorced, recently transferred to NYC, right? And she was just out of college, an aspiring actress, living in some dump out in Jersey? She was starting for the first time, and you desperately wanted to start over. You idealized her relative youth, naïvete, lack of baggage. If you think back, you were probably like that in your own early twenties. Like you say:

Kids lead lives filled with gloriously impetuous passion and thoroughly unrealistic expectations.

And she was a kid. No, you protest, she was just a remarkable woman? What happened, then? What happened (and I speak from experience) is that Jayne felt safe with you, she liked your baggage, your experience, she looked up to you in a way. And for a while she was content to play your sweet girl, but nobody but a sociopath can play a part for a lifetime. You didn't know her, really. In a way, the fault is partly hers for not telling you earlier how wrong you were about her. What has happened was inevitable.

You failed to know her. She failed to make herself known. Can't you just see these as your own individual failures? Why do you have to paint us all with the same brush?

The Manimal said...

Love is an emotional storm - an animal reflex - meant to be controlled by the rational mind. Then again, I am dead on the inside, so you probably shouldn't pay me any attention.

Graphix468 said...

I have to say the whole thing makes me ache so badly for you. I've really been rooting for you two all along. I was overjoyed for you with the birth of Inara and how everything seemed to be better. But in the very dark corners of my mind I wondered if it might just be covering bigger issues... and I'm so very sorry to have thought that and been right.

Divorce is hard anyway but the added distance of being away from your baby is just gut-wrenching.

To be cliché, they say what doesn't kill you makes you stronger, I'm sure you've heard that before. Just know that that there's a whole lot of people out there who are rooting that the latter is the case here.

Be strong Chez. For Inara, if not for yourself. Best wishes.

Anonymous said...

Chez,

As someone who nursed my current boyfriend through his previous breakup I can tell you it will eventually get better. So many of the things you say echo what he was going through it breaks my heart for you. In many ways it's like getting over a death. You just have to keep going and there will be a point when you start to feel somewhat human again. Although the physical distance from Inara must be horrible, perhaps it's good to have this distance from Jayne and this relationship to examine it properly. It's admirable that you're unwilling to trash her, at least for the sake of your daughter. But it might do you good to find a sympathetic ear to just vent to occasionally. Someone who is willing to keep it to themselves so things don't have to get ugly(er) between you and Jayne.

I do have to agree with others who have said that your view of Jayne in the early years of your relationship were just that *YOUR* view.

I wish you all the best.

Rachel

Felis Femina said...

barlova -

You hit the nail on the head.

Anonymous said...

Well . . . just feel the pain and let it go.

And don't scoff at detachment. I have a son born with a deformed heart, that's been re-engineered a couple of times and now just needs to be replaced. To love him, to parent him, I had to detach from him. I do it every day . . . He's here today to help his dad and me celebrate 36 (non-consecutive) years together. Don't know about tomorrow, though.

It's kind of corny Zen but really you should have no expectations. When you cease to have expectations, you have all things.

MelodyLane said...

Closing yourself off and becoming a cynic doesn't help. I went that route once. All it did is it left me alone, more alone than I ever thought possible. I'm still fairly closed off, but now I have perspective.

Marriage and relationships take two people with the same drive and desire to see things work to succeed. Once that initial passion leaves, and it does, something has to replace it under the surface. That can be anything from a long time friendship between partners to a mutual respect and love of one another. Everything, even love, only burns so bright for so long. Love to me has always been a dimmer, more constant flame. Sure every once in a while it gets turned up to white how, but more often than not, it's a subtle glow.

People change, for bad and good. In relationships, you have to be able to tolerate the changes or roll with them. If that's impossible, the relationship's done like a Thanksgiving turkey.

Chez, it's highly possible you fell in love with an illusion, an idea of perfection after a whirlwind through hell. I'm terribly sorry it failed. I fell for an illusion once. The differences were that we weren't married and I got left for a drug addiction. It took me years to be able to love someone again. I did, and I'll be damned if he wasn't the one person who was always right there when I needed a friend. I'm not saying this happens to everyone, but give it time. That which does not kill, only makes you stronger. It will.

Barbara said...

Oh,ouch, Chez! I can empathize, I never thought my husband of 22 years would just turn 50 and leave! But I hope to love and commit again. I think eventually you will cherish the good times and Inara that came from the union, and be able to love and commit again, no matter how impossible that seems now! Best wishes, B

margo said...

I must agree with Barlova and others- you did not see Jayne for who she truely was. I too ache for you and will keep you in my prayers. I hope you can love again because there is too much depth in your soul not to be shared. I hope you love again because I have that wish for anyone who has been lied to. I hope you love again because while I haven't been through the same trials as you I have been tested and now stand in a place where life would be easier if I just stoped trying so for now I transfer my hope to others.

you will heal.

Flagellum said...

Chez,

It looks like Jayne traded you in for a more expensive and luxurious model. I hate to say this Chez but between the lines Jayne comes across like a cold hearted bitch out for money. You were (are?) blinded by love and she took advantage of it.

Or maybe she is just too insecure to be able to handle someone like you.

Don't make the mistake of thinking everybody is like Jayne deep down inside.

marija said...

Of course we all subscribe to the belief in love everlasting. We've been force-fed this ideology since the first fairytales we've been told. Pascal Bruckner published this fantastic essay called L'Euphorie perpetuelle, essai sur le devoir de bonheur (I would translate it roughly as "Perpetual Exhilaration - an essay on forced happiness") which questions the entire Western perception of happiness as a permanent state. And if you think about it - it makes sense; happiness is experiencing short-lasting strokes of exhilaration or excitement or love. I love my boyfriend and we are moving in into our new apartment - an apartment we bought together. But someone pointed out before me - one can love till one bleeds out, you can never know with absolute certainty that the other person will not one day pull the rug from under you. You can only love and enjoy love while it lasts and live in the hope that it will last. This is the only thing resembling religious faith I have in my life. I try to be the best person I can and have vowed never to hurt him because he is my best friend and my safe place and this is the best I can do.

Deacon Blue said...

I've already put in my opinions that marriage CAN be worth the trouble, but at the same time, I wholly understand you current state of mind.

I haven't been twice divorced and about to go through a third, but I do know how a heart can be damaged by someone you love...and I've seen the metaphorical gun pointed at my chest more than once, though the wife has never actually pulled the trigger on me yet. And I hope she never does.

There will be love in your life. If from no other source than being a father of two girls (well, one almost a woman now, but you know what I mean). And if there is no romantic love in your future, there will still be something meangingful I believe. To cut off your heart completely and utterly is, I think you realize, no healthier than leaving yourself wide open.

In the end, you may never marry again, and there's nothing wrong with that. Just as there's nothing wrong with trying again. And nothing wrong with people who wholeheartedly believe in marriage.

Because, you know, I love my wife. If and when my wife and I part ways, whether through divorce or death, I sincerely doubt I would marry again. I don't think I'd let myself be alone forever, but I don't think I could make that kind of commitment a second time.

Does that make you braver than me for having done it three times now? Or more foolhardy?

Neither, I suspect.

You're simply different, and while this will leave scars on you, isn't it the scars that define us as much as anything else?

Anonymous said...

I think it's remarkably simplistic for everyone to say 'Chez should've seen this coming'. C'mon people, you know the hindsight 20/20 principle, right?

I have known Chez since our UM college days, consider him one of my closest friends, and have seen Chez and Jayne as a couple through the years. With that, I have heard both sides and, of course, made my own observations.

With that, let me say that I believe Jayne really loved Chez. But everyone needs to understand that these two met when she was in her early 20s and Chez was fresh off his break-up with Kara and getting out of rehab. She was in awe of Chez' position and confidence and he was desperate to find someone who epitomized the antithesis of Kara. In other words, they were BOTH viewing each other through warped, rose-tinted glasses. That's being human...typically flawed and human.

That said, in my opinion, Jayne is a woman who doesn't have a clue as to who she really is...in her early years with Chez, she morphed herself to what she thought he wanted, and I believe she has now become a caricature of a New York corporate wanna-be, looking to be upwardly mobile (to phrase it kindly).

Her desire for security and city life are not wrong or evil. These are actually things that I know Chez wants too. But instead of building on such shared values together, with her newly created family, she bailed, thinking Chez is incapable.

Chez is certainly not perfect, and he is at the lowest point in his life right now, but it's a temporary low. I have seen more personal growth and responsibility in him over the last few years than I've seen in his entire adult life. He lived to make himself a better man, and at the end of the day, that's the most we can ask for from the ones we love. To me, that's the sign of a good husband and father.

I have expressed this to Jayne, and it never seemed to be enough. Whatever positive change Chez made that anyone would bring up, she would cite 10 offenses from years ago. She could never let the past go and she never could acknowledge her own short-comings. For Jayne it was always more important to be right than in finding a peaceful resolution. Such character flaws prove to be just as large of impediments to their marriage as the issues Chez cited in this piece. And without long-term individual counseling, I think she's doomed to make the same mistakes with whomever she lands next. No matter who he is, what he does, or how much he makes, it will never be enough.

Caren

Chez said...

I've obviously been staying out of this discussion for the most part. I figured I said all I needed to say in the piece itself and that it was best to leave well enough alone.

But I guess I should interject just a little.

First of all, I want to thank everyone for the comments. Admittedly, most of you only really know Jayne and I -- our relationship -- through what you've read here throughout the last few years. The ups and downs and so forth. This means that very few are truly qualified to make definitive statements about what's going on between the two of us (although I believe that a few of you are). Still, the input, insight and discussion have given me quite a bit to think about, and I appreciate it -- and the act of writing about this ordeal has, as I hoped, allowed me to see it in an entirely new light and understand both sides of the equation rather than just my own.

I guess that all I really want to say is this: I still love Jayne very much and respect her greatly. She's the mother of my child -- and a very good one at that. Am I giving her too much credit, considering what's happening right now? Not being harsh enough? I honestly don't know. But I know that not only is it a good idea on my part, but it's the truth to say that despite everything, Jayne means the world to me. I wasn't crazy when I fell in love with her. She was worthy of it in every sense. And if you read back through the archives of this site, you'll see that she stood by me and supported me through some pretty rough times -- regardless of how it all ended. Was she always there when I needed her? Actually, no. But there were times when she needed my support that I was woefully inadequate as well. Bottom line: We're two people with the kinds of problems people sometimes have. She's done things I consider borderline unforgivable -- but I've done different things that are probably kind of unforgivable too.

No pun intended, but for better or for worse -- I love her. I always will.

Thanks again, everyone.

Anonymous said...

I wrote this yesterday, and I want to write it again because I really believe it. "Take this entire experience - the experience that shook you to the core and made you believe in love in the first place, - and hold onto it. You met and loved Jayne for this part of you to awaken." I am so sorry your marriage to Jayne didn't work out, but this is the good that came out of it. And Inara, of course. Thank Jayne for the profound impact she had on you by changing your way of thinking, and move on. You will be okay.
-Kate

em said...

"And does it prove something else: that since we can obviously love more than one person at once, can we in fact love almost anyone if we put our minds to it -- rendering the entire concept of one-man-one-woman-forever-and-ever marriage utterly meaningless? We come together and pledge eternal love, then we split up, or one of us dies, and we eventually come together with someone new and do it all over again."

These are the exact same questions I've been dealing with myself--especially after finding out the person I was seeing was, well, engaged to someone else. Fact is, though, you can't help how you feel. You're always going to love Jayne, and that's just how it is, and in some weird way it's alternately wonderful and sad. You have something wonderful that came out of your relationship, though. Hope writing this helped.

Anonymous said...

Heyla, Chez. Been reading your blog for just over a year now. ;D

Anyway. I'd like to say that I, personally, don't believe that I can promise to be "in love" with anybody forever, and therefore wouldn't believe anyone who told me so. So... I don't believe in marriage for me. But, I don't believe in God either, and I don't see that stopping anybody... ;D

I don't think you'll be a cantankerous misanthrope for too long; nor do I think you need to be told that expecting such after heart break is normal. Just ... don't hate yourself. Whatever you do, don't forget to value yourself through all the heartbreak and the healing. It's so easy to be self-destructive without even realizing it... (not that I think you are doing this, but DAMN I wish I had a little voice somewhere telling me not to self-destruct after a long-term relationship breakup!). I'd add a "Chin up. Everything will be okay," or some such here, but that always seems so empty and meaningless (and occasionally make one feel more alone than ever.)

That being said, I'll take a moment to tell you how wonderful I think your blog is and how lucky I feel to get to read it and share it with my friends.

Anonymous said...

It's tough to have sooo much come down on your head at once but as Anon 5:34 said, "Chin Up", something good your way comes. Be open to it and keep searching for it, you'll find it right around the next corner. Wishing you the very best.

Vikingwench said...

Welcome to the club.

I knew my ex was the man I was meant to be with from the first time I looked into his eyes. At one time I felt the same intimacy with him that you describe about your relationship with Jayne. That you know them better than they do themselves, that they feel the same way about you, that they would never hurt you, that your hearts and souls are so intertwined you are literally two halves of one whole. The pain of having that half of you wrenched away is more than I want to risk again. Add to that realization that you so badly misjudged your relationship, and the triple play of realizing all your friends and acquaintances watched and knew it was happening while you were so secure, smug and confident in the relationship.

We were together for more than 20 years when he told me "it's not working." I haven't dated since he left me 15 years ago. I've learned to be complete within myself, I have the grown children we made together, beautiful grandchildren, good friends and supporting family, and satisfying work. I've come to relish my independence. I don't need to compromise with anyone about the places I want to go or the things I want to do.

After 15 years and several other women, he decided that maybe I was the best game around after all and wanted to renew our relationship.

I still love a part of him, but he is not the man I married 34 years ago. And I'm not the trusting young thing I once was. Once I made the conscious decision to let the pain and grief go (and I held on to those a very long time)I was able to be a good friend and co-parent with him. So he moved back to town and lives nearby and we talk about the kids and I let him come to holiday dinners a couple of times a year to remind everyone he's still part of the family. I will not let him hurt me again, and I know he would if I gave him that much power.

I joke with my kids that I knew from the first time I met their father that if I could get him to take me out one time I would have him for life. And I do. I just didn't know it would be like this. And I meant "for better or for worse", I just didn't realize what the "worse" part entailed.

But we are still a family, even if he and I are not married and don't sleep together. We have a strange relationship, but it's working for our family.

I hope, if nothing else, that you can come to the point where you, too, can let go of the grief and anger (and that's really hard) and find some inner peace. And that you, Jayne and Inara can still be a family, too.

Oh, and that marketing myth that you have to be in love to be happy and if not, you have to be looking for it? That's the great American lie. It's much better to take some time to figure out what and who you really are and what really makes you happy and complete. WHAT makes you complete, not WHO makes you complete. We crazy Americans think we need another person to make us happy and are constantly disappointed. The answer to happiness lies within ourselves.

Anonymous said...

Well said Vikingwench, amen.